Search for: "Williams v. Justice Court"
Results 461 - 480
of 6,252
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Mar 2019, 12:51 pm
In June 2015, a divided Supreme Court said in King v. [read post]
13 Feb 2017, 2:30 am
In a letter written to William C. [read post]
29 Apr 2020, 9:26 am
Supreme Court’s decision in Strauder v. [read post]
18 Jun 2012, 12:41 pm
The Court today (4-1-4) (Justices Alito, Roberts, Kennedy, and Breyer), in Williams v. [read post]
27 Jun 2019, 2:49 pm
This morning the court issued a 5-4 opinion in Rucho v. [read post]
29 Aug 2012, 6:30 am
O'BrienThe Supreme Court As An Issue In Presidential Campaigns, by William G. [read post]
7 Nov 2008, 5:09 pm
Continuing in catch up mode, On Monday The Supreme Court agreed to hear District Attorney's Office v. [read post]
8 May 2023, 4:45 pm
In Hay v Cresswell [2023] EWHC 882 (KB) handed down on 26 April 2023, Mrs Justice Heather Williams held that a sexual abuse victim, Nina Cresswell, had successfully defended a libel claim brought by the perpetrator, William Hay. [read post]
9 Jun 2016, 11:20 am
In Williams v. [read post]
5 Dec 2014, 12:29 am
And, here’s to hoping that Justice Ginsburg ends up writing the Court’s majority opinion. [read post]
14 Feb 2022, 9:01 pm
Supreme Court—Chief Justice Earl Warren and Justice William Brennan—were Republicans appointed by President Dwight D. [read post]
6 Aug 2010, 7:59 am
Court of Appeals decision expressing this view, and the presence of Justice O’Connor on the panel should further raise the profile of the case (though strictly speaking her vote has the same legal weight here as the vote of any circuit judge). [read post]
7 Mar 2007, 9:38 am
Daniel Katz (University of Michigan, Political Science) has posted Institutional Rules, Strategic Behavior and the Legacy of Chief Justice William Rehnquist: Setting the Record Straight on Dickerson v. [read post]
3 Jan 2019, 10:32 am
Indeed, then-Justice William Rehnquist authored a pointed dissent in Hall. [read post]
21 Jun 2023, 12:28 pm
Then-Chief Justice William Rehnquist and Justices O'Connor, Scalia and Clarence Thomas voted to let the lower court action and the charges against the men stand. [read post]
31 Jul 2014, 9:01 pm
In my last column, Part I of this Two-Part series, I argued that lower courts are justified in paying (indeed perhaps required to pay) close attention to Justice Kennedy’s concurring opinion in this summer’s blockbuster Burwell v. [read post]
28 Jul 2022, 1:26 pm
In the coming term, the justices are slated to hear Moore v. [read post]
11 Apr 2011, 12:27 pm
Williams, indeed, noted in his application that Bush v. [read post]
19 May 2008, 7:32 am
Continuing its somewhat puzzling approach (and voting paterns) in ACCA cases, the Supreme Court today in United States v. [read post]
20 Feb 2007, 10:05 am
Some initial thoughts on Philip Morris v. [read post]
