Search for: "Gunning v. Doe"
Results 4781 - 4800
of 5,359
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Jul 2024, 3:11 pm
See Corwin v. [read post]
11 Sep 2022, 9:01 pm
Casey, and the Bruen ruling invalidating a New York gun regulation as violative of the Second Amendment. [read post]
3 May 2020, 9:26 am
Long v. [read post]
10 Jul 2018, 6:21 pm
Sellers, McCoy v. [read post]
24 Sep 2014, 6:01 am
Here’s a classic statement of the principle, from Shannon v. [read post]
18 Mar 2021, 9:33 am
The court went on to hold G.S. 20-16.3A constitutional, specifically finding that the statute does not violate the right to free travel and does not impermissibly foreclose equal protection challenges arising from the placement of checkpoints. [read post]
29 Sep 2007, 6:07 am
Even if Iraq revokes the order, it can't do so retroactively.Order 17 does allow contractors' home states to waive their immunity. [read post]
26 May 2018, 12:11 pm
On Thursday, the Supreme Court of Israel dismissed a petition against the rules of engagement governing use of force by the Israeli security forces in the violent clashes in Gaza (HCJ 3003/18 Yesh Din v. [read post]
23 Sep 2021, 2:12 pm
United States State v. [read post]
1 Sep 2012, 12:20 am
Miller v. [read post]
27 Apr 2022, 4:49 am
Bar Assoc. v. [read post]
25 Dec 2018, 9:30 pm
Gun Regulation is Costly—and Not the Only Option November 9, 2018 | Jennifer Doleac, Texas A&M In the war over gun deaths, vast armies have gathered to contest gun regulations, a territory of uncertain value. [read post]
25 Nov 2013, 10:27 am
Sally Beauty Co., Inc. v. [read post]
27 Jun 2013, 9:01 pm
The General Perjury Statute (18 USC 1621) has been nicely encapsulated in United States v. [read post]
4 Jun 2013, 9:01 pm
Term Limits v. [read post]
20 Aug 2013, 9:15 am
Sally Beauty Co., Inc. v. [read post]
17 Aug 2021, 9:51 am
Today's Third Circuit decision in Drummond v. [read post]
6 Feb 2015, 6:50 pm
Sally Beauty Co., Inc. v. [read post]
4 Jan 2021, 5:01 am
But in R.A.V. v. [read post]
24 Jun 2011, 5:12 pm
Justice Sotomayor does clearly mean something by her reference to hearsay rules. [read post]
