Search for: "MATTER OF B B J B" Results 4781 - 4800 of 5,814
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Jul 2009, 8:36 pm
And either way Dukes may be headed eventually to the Supreme Court.Anyway, we're back on this schtick because earlier this week an anonymous commentator (too bad, s/he'd have gotten a shout out) to our "taking stock" post mentioned a new law review article, J. [read post]
17 Apr 2018, 11:29 am by Eugene Volokh
Most appellate courts that have recently considered the matter have so held as to libel as well. [read post]
29 Jan 2011, 4:19 pm by Joseph C. McDaniel
Don't despair. 581 F.3d 1104 (2009) In the Matter of Antoinette DUMONT, Debtor, Antoinette Dumont, Appellant, v. [read post]
19 Oct 2012, 12:15 pm
Arguably a Wigmore sort of privilege might apply [see Spence J.'s discussion of qualified privilege in Slavutych v. [read post]
12 May 2015, 4:42 pm
When a libel case involves (as this one does) a matter of public concern, a court must decide whether the plaintiff is (1) a public official or public figure, or (2) a private figure. [read post]
17 Oct 2015, 2:29 pm by Adam Steinbaugh
 As Johnson notes, "[p]ersonal [j]urisdiction is about notice. [read post]
15 Oct 2009, 2:53 pm
E no longer had a private interest, as he had been admitted to the school, the matters were of general public importance and, should there be no funding, E was likely to reasonably withdraw, so would withdraw if the protective order was not made. [read post]
29 Nov 2014, 3:53 am by Legal Beagle
No satisfactory explanation has been provided by the defender in relation to that important and remarkable matter. [read post]