Search for: "People v. Thomas"
Results 4781 - 4800
of 5,320
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Feb 2010, 7:57 am
Hood tried to prove that the judge who presided over the case, Verla Sue Holland, and the prosecutor, Thomas S. [read post]
24 Feb 2009, 8:10 am
The Court stated that "it is clear… that the SEC understand[s] the company to be those who act for the company … And that is a small, relatively small group of people, like the board of directors, who have management discretion to run the business and affairs of the company. [read post]
24 Dec 2023, 9:05 pm
FDA Advances Program for Real-World Evidence February 27, 2023 | Blair Bean Robertson, Thomas Jefferson University Hospitals FDA’s approach to evidence-based decision-making may not be addressed to the right people. [read post]
6 Oct 2018, 1:31 pm
, Bush v. [read post]
11 Dec 2020, 9:07 pm
And in turn, that invalidity taints the vote in the Electoral College, by mingling invalid votes with valid ones.As Justice Marshall famously stated in Marbury v. [read post]
19 Aug 2006, 11:19 am
After all, the background of Marbury v. [read post]
13 Mar 2017, 7:55 am
Pena-Rodriguez v. [read post]
13 Mar 2017, 7:55 am
Pena-Rodriguez v. [read post]
16 Feb 2011, 2:16 pm
(Coeur Alaska, Inc. v. [read post]
25 Sep 2019, 2:00 pm
In an apparent attempt to reverse the rogue decision, the majority of active judges on the Ninth Circuit authorized en banc review.[3] But because the Ninth Circuit has so many judges, it alone among the federal appellate courts employs a limited en banc review, where only eleven of its active judges sit en banc, consisting of the chief judge and ten other active judges who are randomly selected.[4] Accordingly, limited en banc allows for “minority rule” in a subset of cases,[5]… [read post]
2 May 2011, 5:29 am
The rhetoric-reality gap is attributable in part to a dilemma the Court created for itself: its national policy favoring arbitration is constitutionally-suspect unless people assent, yet letting people make what contracts they wish would prevent implementing the national policy. [read post]
16 Apr 2009, 9:52 pm
WHEREAS, the Ninth Amendment of the United States Constitution states "[t]he enumeration in the Constitution, of certain rights, shall not be construed to deny or disparage others retained by the people" and the Tenth Amendment states "[t]he powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people. [read post]
15 Jul 2007, 5:57 am
Remember, Thomas Jefferson and others, the founders, suggested that impeachment was an organic process. [read post]
20 Oct 2022, 4:42 am
It’s also unlikely officials would bring only obstruction charges amid several other Trump investigations into potential crimes, the people said. [read post]
10 Sep 2012, 9:06 pm
Here is what I say about this precise topic in Chapter 4 of my new book, in my discussion of the landmark Warren Court opinion of New York Times v. [read post]
19 Jan 2015, 6:28 pm
It had its legal beginning in 1896, when the Supreme Court rendered a decision known as the Plessy v. [read post]
1 May 2016, 4:02 pm
Under EU law in force since May 2011, people must give their consent before an anti-ad-blocker script can run and hide content on a page. [read post]
20 Jul 2018, 3:16 pm
When the police arrived, and the people in the house had trouble identifying whose house it was, the police arrested everyone for trespass. [read post]
10 Oct 2013, 6:47 am
H: U.S. v Doe... [read post]
20 Nov 2015, 5:34 pm
EverBank v. [read post]
