Search for: "The United States, Petitioner"
Results 4781 - 4800
of 8,960
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Jun 2014, 12:53 pm
United States. [read post]
23 Jun 2014, 4:29 am
Finally, JURIST’s Jaclyn Belczyk covers Thursday’s decision in United States v. [read post]
22 Jun 2014, 6:42 pm
First, P&G sued Team Technologies, Inc., alleging infringement of the three patents, in the United States District Court for the Southern District of Ohio. [read post]
20 Jun 2014, 10:14 am
United States, 13-983. [read post]
20 Jun 2014, 4:58 am
In United States v. [read post]
19 Jun 2014, 4:14 pm
We therefore affirm the judgment of the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit.Id. at *1. [read post]
19 Jun 2014, 11:14 am
The United States Supreme Court declined to hear the matter. [read post]
19 Jun 2014, 7:43 am
” Brief for Petitioner 53.But what petitioner characterizes as specific hardware—a“data processing system” with a “communications controller” and “data storage unit,” for example, see App. 954,958, 1257—is purely functional and generic. [read post]
19 Jun 2014, 12:00 am
The United States Patent and Trademark Office issued a decision yesterday cancelling six federal trademark registrations owned by the Washington, D.C. [read post]
18 Jun 2014, 11:40 am
By Rich McHugh The United State Supreme Court issued an opinion on June 12, 2014 in Clark v. [read post]
17 Jun 2014, 7:30 pm
Although he had maintained his status as an O-1 visa holder in the United States, his previous green card application (Based on the EB-11 category) was denied. [read post]
17 Jun 2014, 1:50 pm
In comparison to the Lanham Act, which is predominantly enforced by private suits, the FDCA does not permit private enforcement suits and grants the United States nearly exclusive enforcement authority and pre-empts certain state misbranding laws. [read post]
17 Jun 2014, 8:45 am
We’ve had the United States’ amicus brief opposing Medtronic’s petition for certiorari in Stengel for a few weeks now. [read post]
17 Jun 2014, 7:15 am
United States v. [read post]
16 Jun 2014, 12:25 pm
United States v. [read post]
16 Jun 2014, 11:59 am
SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES _________________ No. 12–842 _________________ REPUBLIC OF ARGENTINA, PETITIONER v. [read post]
16 Jun 2014, 4:48 am
In 2006, Akamai sued Limelight in the United States District Court for District of Massachusetts for infringement. [read post]
15 Jun 2014, 8:31 pm
In December 2012, she changed her status from H-4 to F-1 to pursue her Bachelor’s degree in the United States. [read post]
13 Jun 2014, 10:30 am
Nonetheless, the court concluded that the district court did not commit a reversible error where the good faith exception to the exclusionary rule under United States v. [read post]
12 Jun 2014, 4:19 pm
The petitioners in O’Neill v. [read post]
