Search for: "United States v. Marks"
Results 4781 - 4800
of 9,517
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Nov 2020, 12:48 pm
Number Word Mark 6171625 GANT COIN 6186820 GRASTON 6185288 ACTIVE CARE 6184959 A&A SURFACES 6184958 A&A SURFACES 6184505 SERENSNIPPITY ORGANIC INSPIRED HAIR SALON 6184477 LEGAL SOLUTIONS, PRACTICAL ADVICE 6184413 MARCH MADNESS 6184187 COMMAND GRILLE 6184171 JAVA WAVE 6184117 LUMALUXE 6183997 ZAAD 6186996 INDY HEMATOLOGY EDUCATION 6186778 RECYCLED WEALTH 6183837 COOL SCIENCE MATTERS 6183734 MARINE 31 6183733 MARINE 31 6186699 ESPERTA 6186975 REAL. [read post]
12 Nov 2009, 7:06 am
The United States Supreme Court is already considering a related issue, the extent of immunity for prosecutors who fabricate evidence, in Pottawattamie County v. [read post]
16 Feb 2011, 6:52 am
Nevertheless, the newspaper repeated the defamation: in an article alongside a photograph of Watters the newspaper had stated: We may have to apologise to this revolting pervert but will we mean it? [read post]
30 Mar 2011, 5:00 am
§337(a), which states:“[A]ll such proceedings for the enforcement, or to restrain violations, of this chapter [the entire FDCA] shall be by and in the name of the United States. [read post]
16 Sep 2021, 10:00 am
The allegedly infringed artwork had registered with the United States Copyright Office prior to the creation by the league of the Gull logo and the allegedly infringed logo and the acquired logo appeared to be exactly the same. [read post]
7 Dec 2009, 3:00 am
–discussion of Economist article ‘Sinking Together: Italy’s Business Clusters’ (IP finance) Korea Hybrid patent system (Korea IP Law Blog) Montenegro Patent protection in Montenegro (IPKat) New Zealand New Zealand politicians speak out on ACTA (Michael Geist) Peru Toys that play without a trade mark – INDECOPI campaign checking marks and labelling of toys (IP tango) Poland Bad faith in trade mark applications… [read post]
8 Feb 2016, 7:13 pm
§ 1605.1 (citing United States v. [read post]
14 Dec 2008, 8:39 am
Falcon Stainless, Inc. v. [read post]
8 Mar 2010, 4:36 pm
United States (Copyright Litigation Blog) (Property, intangible) US Trade Marks – Decisions Precedential No. 7: TTAB deems internet printouts admissible via notice of reliance: Safer, Inc v OMS Investments, Inc (TTABlog) TTAB vacates 2008 fraud ruling in Herbaceuticals, Inc v Xel Pharmaceuticals, Inc (TTABlog) TTAB affirms 2(d) refusal of CARMINE’S design for restaurant services in view of two other CARMINE’S designs: In re… [read post]
8 Mar 2010, 4:36 pm
United States (Copyright Litigation Blog) (Property, intangible) US Trade Marks – Decisions Precedential No. 7: TTAB deems internet printouts admissible via notice of reliance: Safer, Inc v OMS Investments, Inc (TTABlog) TTAB vacates 2008 fraud ruling in Herbaceuticals, Inc v Xel Pharmaceuticals, Inc (TTABlog) TTAB affirms 2(d) refusal of CARMINE’S design for restaurant services in view of two other CARMINE’S designs: In re… [read post]
12 Dec 2008, 9:00 am
Software Pty Ltd v Bing Technologies Pty Limited (No 1) (Australian Trade Marks Law Blog) Australian Bureau of Statistics going CC, under attribution-only licence (Creative Commons) (Michael Geist) Canada Depreciation a possible ground in opposition proceedings: Parmalat Canada Inc v Sysco Corporation (Canadian Trademark Blog) Trademarks Office considers changes to opposition practice (International Law Office) Parody defence not available according to BC… [read post]
23 Mar 2016, 9:00 am
United States, 371 U.S. 156, 167 (1962) (internal quotation marks omitted). [read post]
9 Nov 2015, 7:09 am
How many states have done that? [read post]
26 Apr 2011, 8:45 am
United States v. [read post]
1 Jun 2023, 4:45 am
United States. [read post]
19 May 2022, 10:05 pm
The best ones outside of the United States are in Dubai and Amsterdam. [read post]
31 Jul 2009, 4:42 am
., ;07 CV 8473 (GBD); UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK;2009 U.S. [read post]
21 Oct 2011, 2:59 am
VeriSign Inc. v. [read post]
5 Sep 2023, 9:02 am
Mark Meadows (1:23-cv-03621) (civil removal proceedings) GA (Clark): The State of Georgia v. [read post]
20 Oct 2011, 11:39 am
Finally, Monday’s grant of certiorari in United States v. [read post]
