Search for: "Bounds v. State" Results 4801 - 4820 of 9,960
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Jul 2009, 1:25 pm
The court states: In cases alleging negligence, the proper test for proving causation is the one set out in BAJI no 3.76 (8th ed. 1994 bound vol.): The law defines cause in its own particular way. [read post]
20 Dec 2012, 8:06 am by Jay Stanley
But the Supreme Court has left open—in cases like US v Knotts and US v Jones—the argument that there’s a crucial distinction between happening to overhear something, and pervasive surveillance. [read post]
26 Jun 2007, 9:14 pm
City & County of San Francisco, 545 U.S. ___ (2005), for example, the Court held that federal courts are not competent to adjudicate federal constitutional property rights claims unless and until a property owner has exhausted state remedies; and then, the federal court will be bound by the result in state courts. [read post]
4 Jun 2020, 9:39 am by Eugene Volokh
Jackson explained on behalf of the court in the landmark decision of West Virginia State Board of Education v. [read post]
18 Apr 2012, 4:54 am by Heidi Henson
A federal district court in South Carolina has invalidated the NLRB's rule requiring employers to post notice in the workplace informing employees of their NLRA rights (Chamber of Commerce of the United States v NLRB, April 13, 2012, Norton, D). [read post]