Search for: "DOES 1-8" Results 4801 - 4820 of 32,294
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 May 2018, 6:14 am by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
No, it was not, says the Court, in an 8-1 decision written by Justice Sotomayor.As usual, we have competing principles at stake. [read post]
7 Mar 2013, 7:25 am
According to Bankrate Insurance, the risk factors that can contribute to car collisions and traffic-related injuries are: 1) Speed. [read post]
10 Feb 2018, 9:39 pm by Lawrence B. Ebert
(Sept. 26, 2017) at 8–9 (“KLA’s prosecution and procurementof the [’]260 patent was undertaken in bad faithin order to monopolize the . . . market. [read post]
27 Oct 2014, 9:45 am by Matthew Landis
Although there are no tax benefits as there would be with a nonprofit, a for-profit Benefit Corporation has a publicly-stated, legally-binding commitment to providing one or more benefits to society and does not solely consider maximizing value for shareholders as its sole purpose. [read post]
2 Feb 2013, 5:11 pm
If you are a head injury patient in Fort Lauderdale or any Florida city, there are many challenges that you may face on your road to recovery: 1) The symptoms of some head injuries can be tricky to detect. [read post]
7 Sep 2016, 7:48 am
Under Alabama law §13A-8-192, identity theft occurs when: (a)   A person commits the crime of identity theft if, without the authorization, consent, or permission of the victim, and with the intent to defraud for his or her own benefit or the benefit of a third person, he or she does any of the following: (1)  Obtains, records, or accesses identifying information that would assist in accessing financial resources, obtaining identification documents, or… [read post]
19 Jul 2023, 6:16 am by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
The fact that plaintiff's formal termination did not take place for a few months does not undermine her retaliation claim as a matter of law. [read post]
8 Apr 2014, 8:13 am by WSLL
§ 7-11-507(a)), the district court’s “Sentencing Order” does not include a statement to that effect, as required by W.R.Cr.P. 32(b)(1)(E) and Starrett v. [read post]
9 Dec 2015, 5:01 am by James Edward Maule
The latest bill reduces state revenue by somewhere between $8 million and $12 million. [read post]
27 Apr 2014, 9:12 am by Jon
Let us try to sort things out. 1. [read post]
3 Mar 2024, 10:42 pm by Eleonora Rosati
DiscoveryDev Gangjee, Professor of Intellectual Property Law, University of OxfordStephen Reid, Head of Intellectual Property at Imperial Brands PLC 15:40-16:00 – The future of trade marks – revisited (Darren Meale)16:00-16:30 – Coffee/tea break16:30-17:15 – Keynote address: Allan James, Senior Hearing Officer, UKIPO17:15-18:15 – Panel 2 – “A tale of a supreme saga: where does the Supreme Court judgment in Skykick leave us? [read post]
10 May 2019, 7:57 am
The slight misspelling of the mark does not make ARKIVE non-descriptive. [read post]