Search for: "DOES I-X"
Results 4801 - 4820
of 7,298
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Nov 2011, 7:35 am
They want to change their will and change it fast so that the evil-x (or soon to be ex) gets nothing… and I mean NOTHING! [read post]
3 Nov 2011, 2:28 pm
Does it indicate the decisions he might make about innovation? [read post]
3 Nov 2011, 9:16 am
Biogen, I thought I would post it here again. [read post]
3 Nov 2011, 7:33 am
[x]11. [read post]
3 Nov 2011, 7:00 am
I mean, unless I’m going to spend the time and money to go out and get myself an M.D., I am forever going to rely on the expertise of medical professionals to tell me whether my “’X’ levels are too high,” my “’Y’ rates are low,” etc. [read post]
3 Nov 2011, 6:29 am
Does one have to actually possess quality X at the time in order to be a person, or is it enough to have the potential to possess quality X in the ordinary course of things? [read post]
2 Nov 2011, 7:36 pm
If your theory of personhood is about the actual possession of criteria X, on some ways to fill in “X” – such as fetal pain, which I have written about here – fetuses late in gestation may possess the criteria but not embryos as the stage they are discarded/destroyed as part of IVF or stem cell derivation. [read post]
2 Nov 2011, 5:50 pm
Jurisdiction is unusually important in defamation and privacy cases, because the Rome II Regulation (Regulation (EC) No 864/2007), which harmonises choice of law rules for non-contractual claims, does not apply to cases of this kind (art. 1(2)(g)). [read post]
1 Nov 2011, 5:39 am
If the clinic is considering representing X client, “bad law” is that which would be contrary to that X’s interests. [read post]
31 Oct 2011, 8:33 am
App’x 74 (Fed. [read post]
31 Oct 2011, 7:00 am
But how does this work? [read post]
31 Oct 2011, 6:19 am
Students must come to understand, in advance, that, in trying to argue X, they must be ready to point to something underlying X. [read post]
30 Oct 2011, 5:31 pm
Given that an agent has end X, it is rational for the agent to engage in action Y, only if Y will lead to X. [read post]
28 Oct 2011, 9:03 pm
" Or as Jack Welch has also said: “If there was ever a case of ‘Do as I say, not as I did,’ this is it. [read post]
28 Oct 2011, 1:59 pm
I’m going out on a limb here, but I suppose they were “spittin’ mad? [read post]
27 Oct 2011, 3:11 pm
Adidas AG v Pacific Brands Footwear Pty Ltd [2011] FCA 1205 x [read post]
26 Oct 2011, 12:17 pm
To the mid-term of four years in prison.So Kingsberry does his time. [read post]
26 Oct 2011, 11:49 am
PETA officials note that the 13th Amendment prohibits slavery but does appear to limit the ban only to human beings. [read post]
26 Oct 2011, 8:36 am
Yes, although I am dubious as to whether the 5cm x 2cm box prescribed for “reflection” on the learning value of each activity is in fact likely to stimulate reflective learning or cure a tick box mentality. [read post]
26 Oct 2011, 8:21 am
According to Eugene Gurenko, there are three main ways of improving efficiency in the delivery of catastrophe insurance coverage: (i) effective consumer education; (ii) review and harmonize Government’s post-disaster assistance policies across the EU; and (iii) catastrophe insurance product standardization across the EU, e.g. same terms and conditions. [read post]
