Search for: "I. C. " Results 4801 - 4820 of 55,319
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Apr 2012, 3:22 am
Defendant’s driving 52 in a 65 zone in the left lane on I-10 was not reasonable suspicion to stop him where there was no showing that he impeded traffic. [read post]
19 Mar 2012, 6:10 am by Francisco Macías
”–Chapter I, Title I, Article 1 You may recall that last month I posted a “pic of the week” titled “Banner Proclaiming the Spanish Constitution of 1812. [read post]
12 Jan 2021, 11:43 am by Evan Brown
I posted there, and I know what I put up was entirely lawful and friendly. [read post]
24 Feb 2013, 5:00 pm by Ron
On each visit, I look forward to re-reading it. [read post]
31 May 2022, 6:21 am by Michael Heise
As I am seeing more papers trying to do so (as well as discussions about strategies on how to do so), I thought links to a recent StataList discussion as well as some web-based resources might be of general interest. [read post]
10 Nov 2019, 4:00 am by INFORRM
Nothing could be further from the truth and I speak with some authority since I led the legal team in the Pentagon Papers case. [read post]
18 Oct 2010, 12:32 pm by Jim Gerl
  I work a lot in this area, so it is near and dear to my heart. [read post]
20 Sep 2009, 10:55 am
Related posts:ECJ Judgment on Articles 11 (2) and 9 (1) (b) Brussels I Regulation Today, the ECJ delivered its judgment in case C-463/06...ECJ: New Reference on Art. 11 (2) Brussels I Another new reference on the interpretation of the Brussels...German Reference for a Preliminary Ruling – Delimitation between Brussels I Regulation and Insolvency Regulation The German Federal Supreme Court (Bundesgerichtshof) has referred with... [read post]
12 Mar 2014, 1:54 am by Eleonora Rosati
From L to R: Prof Peifer, Eleonora, Jeremy and the legendary Adolf DietzI have just returned from a great trip to beautiful and sunny Munich, where I felt somehow at home and also attended the 4th JIPLP/GRUR Int Joint Seminar, which this time was devoted to discussing "The different notions of copyright-protected work in Europe" [see JIPLP coverage here].As readers may imagine, among other things, the various speakers reviewed the post-Infopaq [here] string of cases, notably… [read post]
12 Mar 2009, 12:53 pm
A) Criminal Defendants B) The Court C) Law Enforcement Did you guess C? [read post]
31 Oct 2016, 5:01 am by James Edward Maule
For those who don’t know what it says, dig in: “For purposes of paragraph (3), an organization described in paragraph (2) shall be deemed to include an organization described in section 501(c)(4), (5), or (6) which would be described in paragraph (2) if it were an organization described in section 501(c)(3). [read post]