Search for: "People v. Wills"
Results 4801 - 4820
of 5,075
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Sep 2016, 9:02 am
In order to seek a waiver of penalties for the 2016 filings made in 2017, an employer will need to meet a standard of reasonable cause and no willful neglect. [read post]
1 Jul 2010, 5:24 pm
But he was willing to give up the opinion-writing in other major cases -- to O'Connor on affirmative action, to Kennedy on gay rights -- to preserve a majority. [read post]
14 Jun 2010, 8:43 am
Supreme Court in 1976 to reinstate the death penalty in Gregg v. [read post]
11 Mar 2007, 3:17 am
"It makes me think if there's 1,000 people on death row and one of them, just one of them, is innocent, is it worth having the death penalty for the other 999? [read post]
12 Mar 2008, 10:56 am
Consider again those nineteen people named on the third indictment and imagine them operating in the marketplace scenario described above. [read post]
27 Feb 2012, 7:51 pm
And to his order last week in State of Florida v. [read post]
24 Mar 2025, 5:41 am
A short excerpt from Friday's 22,000-word North Carolina Supreme Court opinion in Happel v. [read post]
17 Mar 2008, 10:10 pm
And there's a very good quote from the Ontario Court of Appeal decision of Goodman v. [read post]
1 Dec 2020, 4:27 pm
Misleading people and the purveying as facts statements which are not true is destructive of the democratic society and should form no part of such a society. [read post]
5 Jun 2025, 5:01 am
In yesterday's decision by the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals (written by Judge Mary Lou Keel) in Owens v. [read post]
29 Mar 2010, 1:18 pm
Unlike wills, trusts are private documents and only those individuals with a direct interest in the trust need know of trust assets and distribution. [read post]
25 Apr 2011, 7:43 am
With respect to Beebe’s point about how well the system works for an unfamiliar judge: University of Alabama Board of Trustees v. [read post]
12 Sep 2022, 9:00 pm
Some people may possess a sense of fairness that opposes disproportionately high taxes on them as a matter of principle, but for most, what matters more is how it affects the broader public: what it does for the Commonwealth’s economy, understood in terms of jobs, growth, opportunity, and income-earning potential for individuals who will never join the rarified company of those actually remitting under the proposed surtax. [read post]
9 Jul 2018, 8:07 am
CCPA’s sales restrictions raise First Amendment concerns In Sorrell v. [read post]
13 Nov 2022, 9:01 pm
”As the Supreme Court famously explained in Marbury v. [read post]
25 Jul 2022, 5:54 pm
From today's decision of the Minnesota Court of Appeals in Johnson v. [read post]
10 Dec 2011, 6:20 am
For the facts, see United States v. [read post]
20 Jan 2023, 3:03 pm
The Truck Accidents center outlines the various people and entities that might be sued and the evidence that may be vital. [read post]
10 May 2023, 4:00 am
So will media outlets: we are seeing high-value media properties like the New York Times finding a new economic footing because enough people are willing to pay to be informed. [read post]
5 Feb 2007, 7:43 am
I was walking past a table in the Michigan Law Library when a fellow seated there, who in our first year had finished second in our class out of almost 400 people, asked me whether I might have any ideas he could use. [read post]
