Search for: "State v. First Judicial District Court"
Results 4801 - 4820
of 9,114
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Dec 2013, 10:31 am
THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee On Appeal from the 439th Judicial District Court Rockwall County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 2-11-436 To determine whether the lesser-included offense instruction requested by appellant should have been given, we follow a two-step analysis. [read post]
21 Oct 2011, 10:26 am
The circuit court’s order is based primarily on the reasoning of a recent decision by a United States district judge in Shelton v. [read post]
14 Mar 2012, 10:19 am
Bd. of Governors, 968 F.2d 164, 168 (2d Cir. 1992); see generally Restatement (Second) of Judgments § 26(1)(a) (1982).On the topic of judicial economy:Because the district court’s claim construction rulings did not result in a judgment of noninfringement, we are not compelled to address those rulings at this time. [read post]
24 May 2010, 12:54 pm
District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia (Alexandria Division) added another twist (or turn) and ordered the U.S. [read post]
7 Nov 2022, 12:47 pm
United States In Clendening v. [read post]
24 Oct 2011, 7:41 am
On this blog, Orin Kerr previewed the search-related issue presented in United States v. [read post]
18 Jun 2018, 12:19 pm
United States. [read post]
24 Mar 2008, 6:38 pm
In Brody v. [read post]
10 Oct 2011, 3:00 am
In affirming, the Eleventh Circuit ruled, among other things: First, the Court of Appeals determined that the District Court was not obliged to take the allegations of the complaint as true when the subject matter jurisdiction of the federal court was challenged. [read post]
25 Apr 2022, 4:30 am
He concludes, largely on the strength of the SCOTUS opinion in Hartman v. [read post]
31 Aug 2012, 3:31 pm
The petitioners today complied with the District Court’s order. [read post]
15 Aug 2021, 9:30 pm
The State’s “civil service” has two components: the classified service[5] and the unclassified service.[6] The Classified Service Let us first consider employment in the classified service as the majority the employees of New York State as an employer and the employees of its political subdivisions serve in positions in the classified service. [read post]
15 Aug 2021, 9:30 pm
The State’s “civil service” has two components: the classified service[5] and the unclassified service.[6] The Classified Service Let us first consider employment in the classified service as the majority the employees of New York State as an employer and the employees of its political subdivisions serve in positions in the classified service. [read post]
12 Jan 2020, 10:31 pm
The CoA disagreed with the district court. [read post]
24 Jun 2022, 4:55 pm
First, the Court’s most recent mention of Wiener was in Collins v. [read post]
12 Jan 2012, 3:27 am
There’s an excellent pre-Foster 2nd District decision, State v. [read post]
30 May 2022, 9:01 pm
”A statement issued by the Innocence Project following the Shinn ruling agreed with Sotomayor and noted that the Court “set aside the judgments of four federal judges—on both the federal district court and the federal court of appeals—that Barry Jones was represented by a trial attorney whose failure to investigate and challenge the prosecution evidence caused Mr. [read post]
13 Apr 2022, 7:48 am
In Trump v. [read post]
21 Apr 2015, 6:56 am
State v. [read post]
28 Mar 2023, 11:11 am
United States and Barmes v. [read post]
