Search for: "State v. Levell "
Results 4801 - 4820
of 29,466
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Jun 2021, 12:40 pm
Recreational v. [read post]
24 Jun 2021, 11:58 am
Both rulings occurred in United States v. [read post]
24 Jun 2021, 11:50 am
Government agencies at all levels, from local police to international intelligence agencies, have preferred methods of conducting surveillance on cell phones. [read post]
24 Jun 2021, 11:50 am
Government agencies at all levels, from local police to international intelligence agencies, have preferred methods of conducting surveillance on cell phones. [read post]
24 Jun 2021, 10:09 am
The following year, the court stated in McDonald v. [read post]
24 Jun 2021, 10:00 am
Arthrex, case number 19-1452; and Arthrex v. [read post]
24 Jun 2021, 7:30 am
In United States v. [read post]
24 Jun 2021, 6:36 am
See FTC v. [read post]
24 Jun 2021, 6:30 am
First, there is a lot of new material regarding the “loyal denominator” issue (see here and here): whether the former Confederate states were to be included in the Article V total of states of which three fourths were required to ratify an amendment, or whether (as I think) only three fourths of the states represented in Congress were required, because rebel states’ Article V naysaying power, like their Article I right to be… [read post]
24 Jun 2021, 6:00 am
Last month we blogged about the Ontario Superior Court’s decision in Coutinho v. [read post]
23 Jun 2021, 2:46 pm
Data from a Breathalyzer is not the physical entity itself, but rather a software calculation of the level of alcohol in the breath of a potentially drunk driver. [read post]
23 Jun 2021, 2:46 pm
Data from a Breathalyzer is not the physical entity itself, but rather a software calculation of the level of alcohol in the breath of a potentially drunk driver. [read post]
23 Jun 2021, 12:00 pm
The Court cites Polk Bros. v. [read post]
23 Jun 2021, 8:41 am
As featured in #WorkforceWednesday: This week, we focus on evolving pandemic regulations at both the federal and state levels. [read post]
23 Jun 2021, 6:14 am
It was not violated in this case.The case is Keller v. [read post]
22 Jun 2021, 9:05 pm
Supreme Court’s decision in Bostock v. [read post]
22 Jun 2021, 12:02 pm
In Fulton v. [read post]
22 Jun 2021, 11:08 am
United States, 435 U. [read post]
22 Jun 2021, 5:03 am
v. [read post]
22 Jun 2021, 4:08 am
§ 424a(d) explicitly states that a triennial redetermination is not applicable in reverse offset states.Because the NJ Legislature did not include a cost-of-living increase in the statute, and the federal statute exempts reverse offset states from reviewing its benefits triennially, we affirm the order denying a redetermination of benefits and for the reimbursement of overpayment of benefits.Wilhelm v. [read post]
