Search for: "Strong v. State"
Results 4801 - 4820
of 16,440
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Aug 2009, 8:48 am
In a per curiam decision, the Court of Appeals remanded People v. [read post]
3 Oct 2024, 6:15 am
Wharton v. [read post]
24 Jan 2017, 11:14 am
In the unpublished opinion State of Arizona v. [read post]
5 Jun 2018, 12:55 pm
Source: AmberLaneRoberts / iStock / Getty The Court’s June 4 ruling in Masterpiece Cakeshop, Ltd. v. [read post]
4 Jul 2011, 2:04 am
In Coventry CC v Vassell [2011] EWHC 1542 (Admin), the issue for Hickinbottom J, on appeal by way of case stated, was as to the mental element required to convict an HB claimant for non-disclosure of a change of circumstances affecting entitlement to HB under s 112(1A), Social Security Administration Act 1992. [read post]
4 Jul 2011, 2:04 am
In Coventry CC v Vassell [2011] EWHC 1542 (Admin), the issue for Hickinbottom J, on appeal by way of case stated, was as to the mental element required to convict an HB claimant for non-disclosure of a change of circumstances affecting entitlement to HB under s 112(1A), Social Security Administration Act 1992. [read post]
1 Sep 2017, 9:16 am
In MF Global Holdings Ltd. et al. v. [read post]
16 Apr 2018, 1:38 pm
Guest post by Colleen V. [read post]
12 Mar 2019, 3:22 pm
In Singh v. [read post]
1 Oct 2017, 9:21 pm
The case is State of Florida v. [read post]
5 Sep 2015, 1:19 pm
In London Borough of Town Hamlets v. [read post]
5 Jun 2018, 12:55 pm
Source: AmberLaneRoberts / iStock / Getty The Court’s June 4 ruling in Masterpiece Cakeshop, Ltd. v. [read post]
5 Oct 2020, 11:33 am
This was an important case, building upon some earlier cases, like United States v. [read post]
30 Jan 2013, 5:53 am
The conservative movement has been going strong since the 1970s but it is now undergoing a significant process of change. [read post]
21 Sep 2016, 2:04 pm
In Campbell-Ewald v. [read post]
5 Aug 2020, 7:59 am
In Uzuegbunam v. [read post]
16 Jan 2009, 2:54 am
Overlawyered leads us to this line from a Posner opinion in Mirafasihi v. [read post]
23 Dec 2016, 5:43 am
The most well-known case brought under the Computer Fraud and Abuse Act, to date, has been United States v. [read post]
13 Aug 2020, 1:55 am
Seven states, however, tax people where their office is even if they do not actually work in the state, and these individuals may be denied their home state’s credit for taxes paid to another state, exposing them to double taxation. [read post]
27 Feb 2010, 7:46 am
But as was stated in Re S, there is no presumptive priority between ECHR rights. [read post]
