Search for: "The People v. Cross" Results 4801 - 4820 of 6,173
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Feb 2022, 9:01 pm by Michael C. Dorf
Roberts, the author of the notorious 2013 ruling in Shelby County v. [read post]
31 Mar 2011, 10:15 pm by David Lat
Yours truly and Chief Judge KozinskiUnited States v. [read post]
2 Nov 2021, 5:03 am by Stephen E. Sachs
But courts shouldn't permit suits against people who aren't legally liable in them, just because it solves someone else's legal problems. * * * United States v. [read post]
22 Feb 2008, 6:00 pm
: (Part I - IP finance), (Part II – IP finance),Candidates for WIPO Director General: (Innovationpartners), Cross retaliation at the WTO: Why I think WIPO is wrong: (Spicy IP),Officials outline international organisations’ IP enforcement policies: (Intellectual Property Watch),Don’t trust IP to the Post Office! [read post]
9 Aug 2008, 1:50 am
: (Patenting Lives), Worldwide increase in patent filings puts strain on system: (Managing Intellectual Property), WIPO releases 2008 Worldwide Patent Report: (Peter Zura's 271 Patent Blog), (Patent Prospector), (IP Updates), Global patent filings continue rise but may level off; smaller nationals slipping: (Intellectual Property Watch), Means plus function: Don’t ignore the man behind the curtain: (Intellectual Property Directions), Technology start-up entrepreneurs and CEOs: If your… [read post]
10 Sep 2012, 10:03 pm
The State countered by cross-moving, for summary judgment dismissing the claim. [read post]
22 Jul 2015, 2:18 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
 Ambiguity between how much of the discourse in A2K is targeted at patent v. copyright. [read post]
29 Jul 2020, 5:04 pm by Josh Blackman
I understand that different people, on different sides of debates, see the issues very differently. [read post]
10 Feb 2011, 12:56 pm by Jessie Canon
Jones are not the real names but they are real people and their legal problems were all too real. [read post]
8 Aug 2014, 6:11 am by Eric Penzer
  A court should not employ a presumption where to do so would “elevate a legal construct above common sense” (People v Giordano, 87 NY2d 441 [1995]). [read post]
29 Jun 2012, 5:26 am by Russ Bensing
  Back in 2005, in Gonzalez v. [read post]
27 Apr 2011, 9:28 am by Eugene Volokh
To be sure, we do believe that there is a point at which speech can cross the line to unprotected harassment and discrimination. [read post]