Search for: "United States v. John" Results 4801 - 4820 of 11,595
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Dec 2016, 10:01 am by Quinta Jurecic
That year, the Court handed down Hamdan v. [read post]
12 Dec 2016, 3:00 am by John Jenkins
United States, the Court unanimously affirmed that a tipper’s gift of inside information can satisfy the “personal benefit” requirement of Dirks v. [read post]
12 Dec 2016, 12:01 am by rhapsodyinbooks
” Associate Justice of the Supreme Court of the United States John Paul Stevens The nation took the lesson to heart. [read post]
10 Dec 2016, 6:42 am by Quinta Jurecic
Joseph Landau reviewed Peter Spiro’s book At Home in Two Countries and pondered the history of dual citizenship in the United States. [read post]
8 Dec 2016, 4:56 am by Timothy P. Flynn
He ordered the recount to commence.This ruling was appealed in real time to the United States Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals which upheld Judge Goldsmith's initial injunction, but commented that it would expect the lower court to entertain properly filed motions once the Michigan Court of Appeals subsequently addressed the state voting law issues.The Michigan Court of Appeals concluded that Stein could not demonstrate that she was aggrieved as a candidate by either… [read post]
7 Dec 2016, 11:20 am by John Elwood
United States, 16-142. [read post]
6 Dec 2016, 9:33 am by Joseph Landau
  Justice Black’s opinion in Afroyim v. [read post]
6 Dec 2016, 3:41 am by Edith Roberts
Virginia State Board of Elections and McCrory v. [read post]
6 Dec 2016, 2:59 am by Ben
But there's a new Copyright Act in the United States, just two years old, and it will allow you to reclaim your copyright from the publishers after 35 years. [read post]
6 Dec 2016, 1:45 am by Blog Editorial
  Lord Pannick QC says it is no answer for the Government to say that the long title to the 1972 Act “says nothing about withdrawal“. 16:04: Lord Pannick QC refers to the case of Robinson v Secretary of State for Northern Ireland, which he submits supports a “flexible response” to constitutional developments. [read post]