Search for: "V. JACKSON" Results 4801 - 4820 of 9,312
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Oct 2017, 2:22 am by Giesela Ruehl
Vedanta has focused their argument on the fact that Article 4 of the Brussels I Regulation Recast does not automatically allow an English-domiciled parent company to be sued in England and, despite the CJEU’s ruling in Owusu v Jackson, there is always discretion as to whether the English court should allow the claims to be tried in England. [read post]
15 Aug 2008, 3:42 pm
--Houston [1st Dist.] 2003, pet. denied) (holding that denial of untimely request was not abuse of discretion); Jackson v. [read post]
28 Jun 2009, 9:52 pm
In a recent case this month, Barnes v Yahoo! [read post]