Search for: "B. N. S." Results 4821 - 4840 of 16,705
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Oct 2009, 9:33 am by Sevach
Y se trata de un procedimiento de oficio teniendo en cuenta tres datos: a) En primer lugar, el art.4 del R.D.1312/2007 sienta como fase inicial la designación y constitución de las Comisiones de Acreditación, y después tendrá lugar la presentación de solicitudes. [read post]
9 Mar 2018, 4:34 am by Edith Roberts
” Briefly: At Law360 (subscription required), Keith Goldberg reports that “[a]n Arizona utility and a Tesla Inc. rooftop solar unit confirmed Wednesday that they’re close to a settlement resolving an antitrust suit brought by Tesla, less than two weeks before the S. [read post]
19 Feb 2012, 6:57 am by Zachary Spilman
This week at the N-MCCA: The Navy-Marine Corps CCA’s docket doesn’t shows any scheduled oral arguments. [read post]
23 Sep 2020, 10:32 am by Xavier Hamel
De fait, l’employeur était conscient que son directeur général avait bâti l’entreprise en question et qu’il en avait fait « l’œuvre de sa vie »[6]. [read post]
16 Feb 2007, 5:38 am
Domonkos, Appellate Counsel; Tina N. [read post]
27 Mar 2018, 2:00 am by Douglas Marques
Em números absolutos, o maior matador foi o ditador chinês Mao Tsé-tung, que mandou nada menos que 77 milhões de compatriotas para o além. [read post]
12 Oct 2020, 4:38 pm by Arthur F. Coon and Arielle Harris
Previous Executive Order N-54-20 (“EO 54-20”), signed by Governor Newsom on April 22, conditionally suspended these physical noticing and posting requirements. [read post]
20 Dec 2020, 11:44 am
The latest issue of the Revue Québécoise de Droit International (Hors-série décembre 2020) is out. [read post]
30 Apr 2013, 1:53 pm by Christofer Bates
All three motions were denied by the district courts, citing Doe.Doe held that the Sentencing Commission’s policy statement § 1B1.10(b)(2)(b), precluding sentence reductions if a defendant’s "applicable guideline range" is not reduced by the amendment, prevented reductions in cases like these. [read post]
27 Aug 2018, 12:01 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
  It’s not definitionally true that, as the court of appeals concluded, “[b]ecause Munro produces these installations, he is the ‘origin of goods’ or ‘source’ that the names identify, which entitles him to bring an action under the Lanham Act. [read post]
4 Aug 2022, 7:21 am by Alex Phipps
The similarity of matters also supported the court’s hearsay analysis, as it found that the testimony was admissible under the exception in North Carolina Rule of Evidence 804(b)(1). [read post]