Search for: "Doe v. Superior Court" Results 4821 - 4840 of 8,636
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Jul 2013, 11:00 am
A decision by the Quebec Superior Court to authorize a class action to go ahead against Apple Inc. may have set the bar to a new low for certification by not first sorting out whether downloading free apps deliberately breached the privacy of users.In Gad Albilia v. [read post]
16 Jul 2013, 8:55 am by Abbott & Kindermann
Superior Court); and mitigation requirements (City of San Diego v. [read post]
15 Jul 2013, 1:15 pm by Wells Bennett
Ameur does not address the key arguments made here. [read post]
13 Jul 2013, 10:00 pm by Omar Ha-Redeye
The recent decision of Justice Fuerst in R v. [read post]
12 Jul 2013, 10:00 pm by Linda A. Kerns, Esquire
 The Superior Court in Jacoby used logic from a 1999 decision: Raynor v. [read post]
11 Jul 2013, 1:56 pm by Mark Ashton
MRC demonstrates, guidance is coming from the Superior Court. [read post]
7 Jul 2013, 11:39 am by Schachtman
  A jury heard the case in January and February 2011, in Los Angeles County Superior Court, Case No. [read post]
6 Jul 2013, 10:38 am by Venkat
Related posts: Judge’s Facebook Friendship With Victim’s Parent Does not Taint Proceeding -- Youkers v. [read post]
5 Jul 2013, 5:00 am by Bexis
Superior Court, 920 P.2d 1347, 1352-53 (Cal. 1996); Washington State Physicians Insurance Exchange & Ass’n v. [read post]
3 Jul 2013, 4:38 pm by Arthur F. Coon
  The Sixth District Court of Appeal recently presided over such a conflict in Save Panoche Valley v. [read post]
3 Jul 2013, 5:36 am by Simon Fodden
An article in today's Globe and Mail reports on a judgment by Ontario Superior Court justice D. [read post]
2 Jul 2013, 9:30 am by azatty
The first was the wonderful Judge Bob Gottsfield, of the Superior Court for Maricopa County. [read post]
30 Jun 2013, 2:30 pm by Thomas G. Heintzman
But that was recently held to be valid sheltering in the decision of Master Wiebe of the Ontario Superior Court of Justice in The State Group Inc. v. [read post]