Search for: "English v. English"
Results 4821 - 4840
of 11,196
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Dec 2011, 2:40 am
Mwenya [1960] 1 QB 241 per Lord Evershed MR at 292, citing Holdsworth, History of English Law, vol. 9 pp. 108-125)’. [read post]
6 Mar 2011, 12:29 pm
The issues are (1) the application of copyright protection under English law to three dimensional works; and (2) whether a claim of an infringement under US copyright law is justiciable in England. [read post]
23 Jan 2014, 1:05 pm
Systems, Inc. v. [read post]
22 Jul 2019, 4:25 am
On the basis of such a factual analysis, the EAT found jurisdiction for the whistleblowing claims against the Respondents (the Respondents were employed by the UK government under contracts governed by English law and worked in an international enclave in Kosovo). [read post]
25 Mar 2009, 11:05 am
Becamon v. [read post]
27 Oct 2017, 3:40 am
In a lengthy judgment, the Court reviewed its own case law on freedom of expression, privacy and responsibility for internet content, considering a wide range of authorities and international material (including Tamiz v Google from the English Court of Appeal). [read post]
21 Dec 2018, 3:53 am
The rule in Ontario is that tort claims are governed by the law of the place of the tort: Tolofson v Jensen, [1994] 3 SCR 1022. [read post]
27 Jul 2014, 10:11 am
Bank v. [read post]
30 Jun 2014, 6:44 pm
This morning, the Court issued its decision in Burwell v. [read post]
28 Apr 2007, 6:55 am
See Graziano v Harrisoni, 950 F2d 107 (3rd Cir 1991). [read post]
13 Feb 2012, 11:14 am
Wilson v. [read post]
16 Jul 2010, 2:42 am
The domain name is not confusingly similar to RAPID SHARE; is not confusingly similar to CASINO.COM [Mansion (Gibraltar) Limited and Provent Holdings Ltd. v. [read post]
11 Aug 2010, 3:02 pm
" (English v. [read post]
9 Aug 2010, 4:09 am
In Kelly v. [read post]
30 Mar 2018, 1:54 am
Yesterday, the Court declared this application inadmissible as Art 4 of Protocol No 7, according to both its wording and the Court’s previous case law, ‘only concerned “courts in the same State”‘ (see the English Press Release). [35.] [read post]
8 Jul 2014, 4:26 am
Commentators continue to parse last week’s decision in Burwell v. [read post]
9 Aug 2013, 12:05 pm
” (citing Morlife, Inc. v. [read post]
14 Sep 2020, 12:04 pm
Our 2020 Election Litigation Tracker, which we launch today, contains plain-English case summaries, primary documents and links to news coverage at SCOTUSblog and elsewhere. [read post]
16 Feb 2009, 4:37 pm
The Texas Supreme Court had occasion in 1996, in Heritage Resources, Inc. v. [read post]
