Search for: "In Re Opinions of the Justices"
Results 4821 - 4840
of 12,655
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Aug 2017, 9:08 am
The final interpretation of the GDPR will nevertheless be provided by the European Court of Justice. [read post]
3 Jul 2007, 8:04 pm
Now they’re talking about the decision in Parents Involved. [read post]
19 Feb 2010, 11:28 am
Wade, but also a lesser-known opinion called Chambers v. [read post]
10 Jun 2023, 1:12 pm
I quickly replied, the Chief Justice. [read post]
27 Sep 2011, 1:04 am
Advocate General Trstenjak re-emphasised the core points she made in her opinion in N.S (see my summary of this decision here and analysis of both decisions by Steve Peers here.) [read post]
11 Nov 2010, 3:00 am
If you fail to abide, you’re bid will be considered non-responsive. [read post]
11 Jan 2008, 4:36 am
I wonder who they're trying to convince? [read post]
21 Oct 2010, 12:47 pm
We mentioned late last month, back when everybody was still high on the Phillies, that the Supreme Court had granted certiorari in several interesting opinions. [read post]
7 Jan 2017, 8:26 am
Joining the majority opinion were Chief Justice O’Connor and Justices Pfeifer and O’Neill. [read post]
21 Jun 2012, 10:40 am
Res. [read post]
27 Feb 2007, 1:36 pm
Justices George H. [read post]
2 Feb 2009, 10:17 am
They're supposed to be the good guys, whether or not that's justified. [read post]
6 Jul 2012, 5:09 am
It seems that, since the decision, proponents of Obamacare have been reading their theories into Chief Justice Roberts opinion. [read post]
25 May 2011, 7:35 am
Some opinion articles resist such categorization. [read post]
24 Jul 2017, 3:25 am
And in 2000, Randolph Moss from the Office of Legal Counsel in the Justice Department re-examined those two opinions and still found them to be valid based on “judicial precedents” and the interpretation of Founding-era documents. [read post]
5 Aug 2010, 3:52 pm
That's the scoop.P.S. - I like how Justice Gomes begins the opinion: "Plaintiff Susan Henderson's counsel went 'all in' on a bad bet. [read post]
27 Apr 2017, 8:59 am
But you’re not. [read post]
3 Nov 2011, 6:37 am
Justice Kennedy, the swing vote on the Court, wrote the majority opinion in a case that held a very similar law unconstitutional. [read post]
20 Feb 2011, 4:35 am
They make fine pets, if you're so inclined. [read post]
9 Sep 2014, 7:23 am
Maybe the Texas Supreme Court is reading this opinion right now and thinking about deciding the Texas state case In re J.B. out of the Dallas court on the validity of same-sex marriages and the right of Texas to grant a same-sex divorce. [read post]
