Search for: "Low v. Low" Results 4821 - 4840 of 15,570
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Mar 2016, 1:55 am
 * “Verlados”, “Calvados”, GI's and the question of "evocation"Lindesay Low, Senior Legal Counsel at the Scotch Whisky Association, shares his thoughts on the recent decision Viiniverla Oy V Sosiaali- ja terveysalan lupa- ja valvontavirasto(C-75/15), where the CJEU considered whether the use of the name “Verlados” on a Finnish cider spirit, was an illegal evocation of the geographical indication “Calvados”.*… [read post]
18 Jul 2024, 11:55 am by Rose Hughes
The Central Division of the UPC has issued its first revocation order (Sanofi v Amgen, UPC_CFI_1/202). [read post]
13 Nov 2015, 6:16 am
We find that [Stevens’ has not met even this low threshold. [read post]
11 Mar 2015, 2:54 am
This case is Kelly-Brown v Winfrey, No. 11 cv 7875 (S.D.N.Y. [read post]
17 May 2016, 3:34 pm
In 2007, Mr Justice Pumfrey tried to do away with disclosure on obviousness in Nichia v Argos. [read post]
24 Jul 2014, 5:05 pm by INFORRM
“Substantial” is here used merely as a distinction from “nominal”: the awards made to date are still relatively low, much as the early breach of privacy awards were. [read post]
10 Aug 2021, 3:42 am by CMS
  In reaching its decision, the Supreme Court relied heavily on its judgment in Vedanta Resources PLC and Anor v. [read post]
25 Jan 2011, 3:51 am by INFORRM
Compared to that, the social utility or value to be attached to identification, as such, is relatively low: cf. [read post]