Search for: "MATTER OF B T B" Results 4821 - 4840 of 19,798
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Jan 2024, 3:58 am by SHG
They are entitled to pick whomever they want, no matter how much they make Bill Clinton appear to be sexually virtuous. [read post]
12 Apr 2010, 3:26 am by SHG
  This is no doubt intended to play well with potential clients, under the assumption that clients won't be able to figure out that calling oneself prominent isn't the same as being called prominent (a) by someone else, and (b) by someone whose opinion matters. [read post]
10 Oct 2015, 9:37 am by Venkat Balasubramani
He went on to say: [T]hese b#$* caught him [Villalpando] slipping Then they fucking snitching I’m f*$& all these b*#$ Hunting down all these snitches Shit you know we have no fear I’ll have your head just like a dear It will be hanging on my wall . . . [read post]
25 Mar 2009, 6:00 am
  As a matter of due process, you can't just take phase one and say that entitles you to monetary relief. [read post]
26 May 2011, 10:54 am by Bexis
  We don’t think the distinction matters because the statute doesn’t distinguish between the two situations. [read post]
9 Apr 2015, 2:14 pm by Dan Kirkpatrick
(Obviously, the same isn’t true when it comes to cable.) [read post]
30 Jul 2007, 6:04 pm
It Doesn't Matter Any More -- Buddy Holly6. [read post]
28 Jun 2011, 9:00 pm
The latest contribution to this effort comes from Donald B. [read post]
11 Mar 2010, 12:30 pm
"End-to-End 30(b)(6) Testimony" I don't want to get into too much detail over this so here is a good post on FRCP 30(b)(6). [read post]
10 Apr 2023, 6:02 pm by Russell Knight
 Mitchell, 2014 IL 116311 (citations omitted) If you don’t have service…you don’t have a viable divorce case. [read post]
23 Jul 2010, 10:06 am by Joseph C. McDaniel
"Now, Sasha (not her real name) is simply wrong, as a matter of law; her pitchfork won't penetrate the automatic stay. [read post]
4 May 2010, 1:08 pm by Jeff Gamso
  You don't chose to fight in court A, lose, then decide to refight exactly the same battle in court B. [read post]
21 Mar 2016, 3:30 am by Eric B. Meyer
Or, maybe they don’t care because the company is generally solvent enough to resolve the matter without requiring anyone else to chip in. [read post]
16 Apr 2014, 11:23 am by Dan Kirkpatrick
In the FNPRM the Commission proposes retaining the existing local television ownership rule (although the term “Grade B contour” for overlap purposes would be replaced by “digital Noise-limited service contour” (NLSC), the equivalent of the “Grade B contour" for DTV purposes). [read post]