Search for: "Mark I. Congress"
Results 4821 - 4840
of 7,022
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Mar 2010, 8:18 am
In marked contrast to Federal policy for more than a generation, I believe we came up with a very reasonable and progressive policy, one that means that a major success for CIRM will not only mean a cure for a chronic disease, but a direct financial return to California's general fund, as it should. [read post]
6 Aug 2021, 6:00 am
In this instance, Congress has to decide whether Americans deserve to know what really happened on January 6. [read post]
23 Aug 2022, 9:04 pm
Congress authorizes and even encourages. [read post]
12 Jul 2021, 4:13 pm
His attorneys are arguing – creatively, but I believe without much legal foundation – that the Communications Decency Act is unconstitutional in that Congress has given platforms too much speech-policing power. [read post]
16 Oct 2022, 9:05 pm
Congress imposed an onerous set of extra procedures on the agency in 1981. [read post]
1 Oct 2007, 6:01 pm
However, in 1998 Congress — after extensive lobbying by Bacardi and others — exempted from the general license any mark, trade name, or commercial name that was used in connection with a business or assets that were confiscated, as that term is defined in § 515.336, unless the original owner of the mark, trade name, or commercial name, or the bona fide successor-in-interest has expressly consented. [read post]
7 Apr 2010, 8:24 am
I am sure that it will mark the beginning of a fruitful partnership between the Congress party and the larger legal community.I wish you all success.Jai Hind! [read post]
7 Jul 2023, 6:05 am
Of the 20 journalists and media support workers killed, 13, including Abu Akleh, were wearing protective gear clearly marked “PRESS” or traveled in vehicles with TV and press insignia. [read post]
18 Jun 2022, 8:09 am
She said on Thursday “I look forward to talking to them,” adding, “I can’t wait to clear up misconceptions. [read post]
3 Jan 2018, 12:29 pm
I give them an A+++. [read post]
25 May 2010, 12:41 pm
Section 1338(a) provides that "[t]he district courts shall have original jurisdiction of any civil action arising under any Act of Congress relating to patents, plant variety protection, copyrights and trade- marks. [read post]
29 Feb 2008, 8:00 am
: (Spicy IP),Recent trends in IP strategy – an excerpt from London talk: (IP ThinkTank),World Customs Organisation recommends far-reaching new rules on IP: (Intellectual Property Watch),Members seek ways to move policy in WIPO Traditional Knowledge Committee: (Intellectual Property Watch)Global - Trade Marks / Domain Names / BrandsXerox – avoiding genericide: (Afro-IP),Big business urges adoption of Anti-Counterfeiting Treaty: (IP Justice),WIPO press release… [read post]
27 Jun 2024, 10:11 pm
S. 555, 561 (1992) (internal quotation marks omitted). [read post]
20 Jun 2018, 5:00 pm
United States without reaching the central question presented by the cert petition, which involved clarifying the rule of Marks v. [read post]
6 Feb 2009, 7:00 am
: No access to ‘non-minor amendments’ on EU website (Class 46) EPO gets access to India’s traditional knowledge digital library (Spicy IP) Germany Bundesgerichtshof clarifies circumstances under which work may be considered ‘not published’ under s 71 Copyright Act in case concerning Vivaldi’s ‘Motezuma’ (IPKat) Federal Patent Court: ‘Die Drachenjäger’ (the dragon hunter) devoid of… [read post]
8 Jan 2024, 5:50 am
In his remarks on the attacks, President Joseph Biden was blunt: “Let me say again — to any country, any organization, anyone thinking of taking advantage of this situation, I have one word: Don’t. [read post]
3 Apr 2017, 2:46 pm
The re-adjustments in both respects will mark the trajectory of Cuban life for the next generation (compare here, with here). [read post]
14 Mar 2009, 1:01 am
The Congress members stated that there will be more hearings on the SORNA issues. [read post]
22 Jan 2015, 6:07 pm
I. [read post]
30 Jun 2023, 5:50 pm
Many happy thoughts and feelings collided in my mind and heart as I read the June 23, 2023 decision of the Supreme Court in U.S. v. [read post]
