Search for: "State v. Congress" Results 4821 - 4840 of 29,288
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Sep 2021, 9:53 am by Claire Juneau
 In United States v. 43.42 Acres of Land, the court examined ownership of a subsurface cavern created by the removal of salt. [read post]
29 Sep 2021, 5:01 am by Jonathan Shaub
In response to these requests for presidential records, Trump declared that “[e]xecutive privilege will be defended, not just on behalf of my Administration and the Patriots who worked beside me, but on behalf of the Office of the President of the United States and the future of our Nation. [read post]
28 Sep 2021, 9:01 pm by Michael C. Dorf
However, to this point, collective means of addressing the problem have been cut off.Two years ago, in Rucho v. [read post]
28 Sep 2021, 11:47 am by Eric Goldman
In other words, the law will produce outcomes that are directly opposite to what we want from Congress. [read post]
27 Sep 2021, 11:11 am by Gerard N. Magliocca
United States, denies to Congress or to the Treasury the power to default on our national bonds. [read post]
27 Sep 2021, 7:48 am by Kevin Kaufman
First, plaintiffs argue that the provision fails the ambiguity test under Pennhurst State Sch. v. [read post]
27 Sep 2021, 7:26 am by Lisa Larrimore Ouellette
Pillar III will help rebuild our crumbling public health infrastructure, including at the state and local level. [read post]
27 Sep 2021, 6:03 am by Michael DelSignore
However, some courts have recently begun applying the Supreme Court’s decision in the case of United States v. [read post]
The WHPA was approved as state-imposed restrictions to abortion access continue to grow, and the fear that protections afforded in the landmark case of Roe v Wade will be rendered moot. [read post]
24 Sep 2021, 11:59 am by Andrew Hamm
Constitution; and (2) whether ICWA’s placement preferences exceed Congress’s Article I authority by invading the arena of child placement — the “virtually exclusive province of the States,” as stated in Sosna v. [read post]
23 Sep 2021, 7:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
" Additionally, the Appellate Division noted reimbursing retirees for Medicare Part B premiums is not an improper gift of public funds in violation of Article VIII, §1, of the New York State Constitution," citing Baker v Board of Education, 29 AD3d 574. [read post]
23 Sep 2021, 7:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
" Additionally, the Appellate Division noted reimbursing retirees for Medicare Part B premiums is not an improper gift of public funds in violation of Article VIII, §1, of the New York State Constitution," citing Baker v Board of Education, 29 AD3d 574. [read post]
22 Sep 2021, 9:08 pm by Michael Lomtevas
But to do so, Congress will need to reform the nation’s ocean permitting system, the CRS concludes. [read post]