Search for: "Still v. Justice Court"
Results 4821 - 4840
of 19,587
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Feb 2022, 1:58 pm
And since that's still an issue, it'll come back again: this time, as an ineffective assistance of counsel claim. [read post]
24 Jan 2022, 4:33 pm
This is because appellate courts are courts of review and "[n]o matter how independent an appellate court's review of an issue may be, it is still no more than that — a review. [read post]
29 Apr 2020, 11:29 am
That would be the Supreme Court case of Dewsnup v. [read post]
9 Mar 2016, 11:37 am
For 33 years, unionized employers in the Sixth Circuit had to deal with the holding and, worse still, the application of the decision in UAW v. [read post]
14 Apr 2018, 4:18 pm
In the Court of Appeal, Lord Justice Davis (with whom Lady Justice Sharp and Lord Justice McFarlane agreed) dismissed the appeal, and agreed with the claimant’s lawyers that Mr Justice Warby had erred. [read post]
7 Jun 2011, 5:42 pm
If so, the achievement of the Supreme Court in Mapp v. [read post]
17 Mar 2017, 3:21 pm
Because a court that acts in excess of jurisdiction still has “jurisdiction over the subject matter and the parties in the fundamental sense” (Abelleira v. [read post]
25 Jun 2018, 4:26 am
There are two decisions still left from the court’s February sitting, but it’s hard to predict who might be writing this opinion because four justices have not yet written opinions in February. [read post]
5 Feb 2024, 7:05 am
In South Africa v. [read post]
7 Apr 2014, 9:00 am
Merpel doesn't get out of bed for any IPEC (né Patents County Court) judgment -- but Brundle v Perry [2014] EWHC 979 isn't any IPEC judgment. [read post]
17 Sep 2018, 3:55 pm
In Krishnamoorthy v. [read post]
5 Mar 2012, 10:40 am
According to Caterpillar,despite the requirement laid down by the Court of Appeal in Faccenda Chicken Ltd v Fowler [1987] Ch 117 and Roger Bullivant Ltd v Ellis (1987) ICR 464 that the confidential information be identified, the court could still apply the principle established by the House of Lords in Bolkiah v KPMG [1998] UKHL 52 that an ex-employee can be barred from carrying out specified work for a new employer unless that… [read post]
21 May 2019, 6:01 am
” Justice Fischer, to counsel for the Andersons On April 24, 2019, the Supreme Court of Ohio head oral argument in Aaron Anderson, et al, v. [read post]
3 Dec 2010, 4:27 am
But before the big event, the Court still has a lot of work to do. [read post]
30 Oct 2019, 5:05 pm
In accordance with the recent Court of Appeal decisions in Mionis v. [read post]
10 Dec 2013, 1:58 pm
In Lozano v. [read post]
18 Nov 2021, 4:34 am
” In reaching this conclusion, the Court of Appeals relied solely on LaLonde v. [read post]
12 Aug 2012, 10:30 pm
A federal district court must still follow Baker. [read post]
7 Oct 2020, 9:01 pm
One of the Court’s absolute worst recent decisions, Trump v. [read post]
12 Jul 2010, 7:47 am
[T]he First Amendment may still have a role to play at trial. [read post]
