Search for: "United States v. Circuit Judges"
Results 4821 - 4840
of 16,267
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Jan 2015, 8:00 am
LEXIS 6879 (ED CA, Jan. 20, 2015), a California federal magistrate judge dismissed with leave to amend claims by an inmate that authorities restricted his ability to practice Shetaut Neter in the prison's Special Housing Unit by preventing a name change and ordering of spiritual items, and by denying communal worship, observance of Neterian holidays and access to a Neterian chaplain.In Gee v. [read post]
1 Oct 2009, 2:45 pm
United States (1960) 364 U.S. 40, 49. [read post]
20 Dec 2020, 4:30 am
Their brief (which Judge Altonaga acknowledged to be cogent and well supported) is a goldmine for any defense attorney advancing an argument for compassionate relief.The case is United States v. [read post]
2 Feb 2018, 1:31 pm
The new law no longer requires an invalidating sale to be in the United States – now it can be anywhere. [read post]
11 Jul 2012, 5:30 pm
An “Officer of the United States” within the meaning of the Appointments Clause, is not simply an “employee,” but is a person who “exercise[s] significant authority pursuant to the laws of the United States. [read post]
15 Jan 2020, 5:03 pm
In United States v. [read post]
28 Apr 2011, 12:27 pm
Readers may recall I once blogged about a similar case, United States v. [read post]
6 Oct 2016, 7:40 am
United States v. [read post]
18 Jan 2010, 7:14 am
United States v. [read post]
21 Jul 2009, 12:37 pm
Ceballos, the United States Supreme Court held that a government employee's speech made in a official capacity was not protected under the First Amendment. [read post]
27 Aug 2011, 7:13 am
United States v. [read post]
18 Nov 2011, 9:03 am
Tompkins and Miranda v. [read post]
3 Aug 2007, 1:14 pm
Greg May has brought to my attention a significant en banc decision, United States v. [read post]
28 Oct 2015, 6:28 pm
In 2004, then-Chief Judge Wilkins of the Fourth Circuit filed a dissent in United States v. [read post]
26 Jul 2024, 4:54 pm
United States and Duffey v. [read post]
14 Feb 2012, 7:39 am
In Murray v. [read post]
13 Feb 2007, 8:00 am
There is a lot in Pickett that merits highlighting, but this paragraph may be my favorite and the most important aspect of the decision (and not just for crack cases, but for all cases):While Booker and § 3553(a) instruct sentencing courts to consider all these "multiple and vague" factors, United States v. [read post]
27 Jun 2022, 7:39 am
It held in United States v. [read post]
22 May 2008, 11:08 pm
BOTELHO, Petitioners v. [read post]
6 Aug 2012, 1:10 pm
In the case, United States v. [read post]
