Search for: "Does 1-35"
Results 4841 - 4860
of 9,559
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Mar 2015, 9:10 pm
[…] I/P Engine does not dispute that the prior art disclosed hybrid content-based and collaborative filtering.Id. at *10.Applicant’s admissionGiven that its own [read post]
11 Mar 2015, 10:47 am
" 35 U.S.C. [read post]
11 Mar 2015, 7:03 am
What does the new law mean for workers? [read post]
11 Mar 2015, 6:23 am
In other states, inmates in solitary confinement account for 1 or 2 percent of the incarcerated population. [read post]
11 Mar 2015, 4:00 am
See 1993 Proceedings of the Uniform Law Conference of Canada, Appendix G, pages 34-35, 198 – 206. [read post]
9 Mar 2015, 12:23 pm
| Hospira v Genetech Mark 1, the Appeal | [read post]
9 Mar 2015, 3:00 am
A proposed timeline is contained in Annex 1.ARGUMENTSA. [read post]
8 Mar 2015, 6:06 pm
The largest group of women using ART services were women younger than 35, representing 41% of all ART cycles carried out in 2004. [read post]
8 Mar 2015, 9:02 am
SECTION 1-201. [read post]
7 Mar 2015, 9:26 pm
” ’706 Patent col. 1 ll. 16-22. [read post]
6 Mar 2015, 7:56 am
(NB: The image I found of Rock On does have orange on the label, but apparently the control used had “no significant red, orange, yellow, or blue coloring. [read post]
5 Mar 2015, 2:47 pm
As is now customary, the CJEU ‘re-organised’ the six referred questionsand answered all of them (except one) in its eight Rulings, as summarised below:Multifunctional media (Question 4 / Ruling 1) Q: In relation to multifunctional media (e.g. a memory card capable of being used for both private copying and unrelated purposes), to what extent does its function affect the requirement to pay fair compensation? [read post]
5 Mar 2015, 9:14 am
This enables the court to affirm that exhaustion does not apply to “multiple [read post]
4 Mar 2015, 12:27 pm
In his speech, he roundly condemned the nuclear deal being negotiated between Iran and the P5+1. [read post]
3 Mar 2015, 11:19 am
Thus, a project opponent simply showing substantial evidence supporting a “fair argument” that an otherwise-exempt project may have significant adverse environmental impacts does not defeat an exemption – the opponent must also make a “factual” showing to the satisfaction of the lead agency that “unusual circumstances” exist and have resulted in the potentially significant impacts. [read post]
2 Mar 2015, 4:22 pm
The general effect of the postings on CG was that he “was extremely concerned and lived in increased fear as he anticipated violence being inflicted on him” ([35]). [read post]
1 Mar 2015, 9:08 pm
Copyright Office, which can be done online for just $35 – $55 fee. [read post]
27 Feb 2015, 9:44 pm
2014-00087-35-3-cv Filed under: Current Caselaw, Wireless Communications [read post]
26 Feb 2015, 1:30 pm
In rejecting Gilead’s appeal, the Federal Circuit found: (1) the statute does not particularly address the IDS question but does give the USPTO authority to fill-the-gaps; and (2) the USPTO’s approach of creating an across-the-board rule is reasonable and certainly not arbitrary-and-capricious even though an applicant’s action may not have caused delay in the particular case at issue. [read post]
26 Feb 2015, 7:03 am
Even though claim 1 itself does not provide a detailed explanation of how packet headers are used to allocate the bandwidth, the inventive concept lies in the limitation of using packet headers to allocate bandwidth, not in the details of implementation. [read post]
