Search for: "Grant v Grant"
Results 4841 - 4860
of 104,893
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Jul 2023, 10:28 am
In State v. [read post]
27 Jul 2023, 10:13 am
*New Case Law The Court of Appeals recently ruled in Lake Lindero Homeowners Association, Inc. v. [read post]
27 Jul 2023, 8:52 am
While missing the July 14 deadline would normally have delayed consideration of AB 1228 for a full year, proponents of AB 1228 hope the Senate Rules Committee will grant a waiver to hold a special hearing in August or September. [read post]
27 Jul 2023, 6:45 am
In 2018 the Supreme Court decided an important case—Ortiz v. [read post]
26 Jul 2023, 9:01 pm
Thank you, Chair Gensler. [read post]
26 Jul 2023, 7:21 pm
The Matter of Grace v. [read post]
26 Jul 2023, 4:34 pm
In late June, California’s Fourth District Court of Appeal upheld a Superior Court decision in Save Our Access v. [read post]
26 Jul 2023, 3:24 pm
” In support of their argument, the plaintiffs cited Texas v. [read post]
26 Jul 2023, 2:41 pm
The appeals court cited Roman v. [read post]
26 Jul 2023, 12:32 pm
Joyce & Wicked Willow Press, LLC v. [read post]
26 Jul 2023, 11:54 am
Just as concerning from a timeliness perspective, those granted expedited processing waited 199 days —also all-time agency high—up from 99 days the previous fiscal year. [read post]
26 Jul 2023, 11:31 am
Young, denied the motion as to defendants Pega and Trefler, but granted the motion as to defendant Stillwell. [read post]
26 Jul 2023, 8:53 am
The tribunal of first instance granted most of his claim in 2013. [read post]
26 Jul 2023, 8:13 am
Based on the complaint, Chegg v. [read post]
26 Jul 2023, 7:36 am
The court referred to Town of Oyster Bay v. [read post]
26 Jul 2023, 5:01 am
From Redacted v. [read post]
26 Jul 2023, 5:00 am
In the case of Childs v. [read post]
26 Jul 2023, 4:43 am
In a 5 year old case, a default judgment was granted and upheld on a motion to reargue/renew. [read post]
26 Jul 2023, 1:53 am
In Sun Pharma v. [read post]
26 Jul 2023, 12:05 am
The court also found that the Applicants satisfied other elements for the grant of an interim injunction viz: the existence of a prima facie right; a reasonable apprehension that if the interim relief is not granted the applicant will suffer irreparable harm; the balance of convenience favours the granting of the interim relief; and the absence of any other satisfactory remedy. [read post]
