Search for: "Held v. State"
Results 4841 - 4860
of 82,195
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Jun 2013, 7:47 am
Because the statute generally protects highly sensitive information, any exception should be read narrowly, the Court held. [read post]
6 Aug 2015, 5:09 am
Particularly at para 45 the CJEU held that “the Member States must, when exercising their powers in the sphere of nationality, have due regard to European Union law. [read post]
20 Mar 2009, 2:05 am
United States, 880 F.2d 84, 86-87 (8th Cir. 1989).Kansas: Savina v. [read post]
5 Apr 2024, 2:44 am
In this post, Holly Ranfield, Associate at CMS, preview the decision awaited from the Supreme Court in RTI Ltd v MUR Shipping BV. [read post]
29 Jan 2009, 8:15 am
In Arkin v Borchard Lines Ltd [2001] NLJR 970 Coleman J held:"On the proper construction of [section 58] the only permissible conditional fee agreements are those entered into before it is known whether the condition of success has been satisfied. [read post]
9 May 2012, 12:21 pm
In Patino v. [read post]
16 May 2014, 4:00 am
State Policy v New York State Teachers' Retirement Sys., 103 AD3d 1009 [3d Dept 2013]; Matter of Empire Ctr. for N.Y. [read post]
6 Apr 2012, 4:00 am
(Karner v. [read post]
15 Jan 2008, 10:00 am
On Monday, January 14, 2008, the Supreme Court issued an Order inviting the Solicitor General of the United States to file a brief expressing the views of the United States Government in Progress Energy, Inc. v. [read post]
12 Mar 2009, 4:41 am
California's Court of Appeal for the Fourth District has held that an insured is entitled to stack policy limits of all applicable policies when there is a continuous loss spanning multiple policy periods and policy provides for payment of "all sums" that insured becomes liable to pay, State of California v. [read post]
27 Feb 2020, 3:40 am
Gabriel Chin analyzes Tuesday’s oral argument in United States v. [read post]
24 Apr 2015, 4:00 am
In East West Bank v. [read post]
21 Mar 2007, 9:32 am
The Minnesota Public Utilities Commission v. [read post]
17 Mar 2016, 6:16 am
The trial court set and held a hearing on damages. [read post]
2 Mar 2011, 6:49 pm
In some states, e.g., North Carolina, see Frances Hosiery Mills, Inc. v. [read post]
23 Aug 2010, 6:05 am
In McDonald, the Supreme Court held that the Second Amendment individual right to possess arms for self-defense as recognized by DC v. [read post]
30 Sep 2014, 9:35 am
Inc. v. [read post]
2 Nov 2016, 8:51 am
Comment The UKSC held that neither EU law nor international law made the USA exempt from collective redundancy consultation obligations under TULCRA. [read post]
10 Apr 2009, 5:03 am
(Charles Mallin, Debra Windsor for the State and David A. [read post]
11 Dec 2019, 1:30 am
Therefore the central issue in both the cases under appeal was the interpretation and application of the statutory incompatibility ground of decision identified in the majority judgment in the Supreme Court in R (Newhaven Port & Properties Ltd) v East Sussex County Council [2015] UKSC 7. [read post]
