Search for: "Mark May" Results 4841 - 4860 of 63,787
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 May 2012, 5:53 pm by admin
Both the May 4 presentation and the May 17 webinar can be expected to give you a preview of the book.Hope to see you for one or both of these events. [read post]
1 May 2012, 5:53 pm by admin
Both the May 4 presentation and the May 17 webinar can be expected to give you a preview of the book.Hope to see you for one or both of these events. [read post]
21 Nov 2010, 9:02 pm by Patent Docs
Bristol-Myers Squibb Co. 2:10-cv-00497; filed November 18, 2010 in the Eastern District of Texas False marking based on BMS' marking of its Cefzil products, its Buspar products, and its Pravachol products U.S. [read post]
11 Mar 2007, 5:36 pm
" The Board noted that Applicant may not raise this defense without a counterclaim seeking to cancel the involved registrations. [read post]
27 Jan 2010, 7:31 pm
"Automatically" may not be the correct word but you should be able to "graduate" to the Principal Register without much problem. [read post]
10 Aug 2010, 11:51 am by Thaddeus Mason Pope, J.D., Ph.D.
The Patient Self-Determination Act (PSDA) marks its 20th anniversary in 2010. [read post]
27 Sep 2007, 5:02 pm
An inference of materiality may be raised when "the place in question is famous as a source of the goods at issue. [read post]
25 Mar 2024, 4:58 am by Marcel Pemsel
However, the BoA may not create subcategories arbitrarily. [read post]
26 Jan 2010, 3:32 am by John L. Welch
However, Nestle "no longer maintains any rights in this mark," and so the Board found this situation distinguishable from those in which "multiple third parties using similar marks may have the impact of weakening or boxing-in a potential plaintiff. [read post]
6 Dec 2006, 5:11 pm
" In re Big Pig, Inc., Serial No. 78249582 (November 16, 2006).Applicant's specimen of useLikelihood of confusion: Applicant Big Pig, Inc. trotted out what may be the losingest TTAB argument: it attempted to limit the goods of its application and the cited registration by referring to the actual channels of trade and manner of use of the marks. [read post]
2 Mar 2008, 4:02 pm
""In order for the Morehouse doctrine to apply, whatever injury opposer may have sustained or may sustain from the registered mark cannot be increased by registration of a second mark. [read post]
15 May 2008, 2:51 pm
Ford Motor Inc. is voluntarily recalling over 655,000 F-150 and Lincoln Mark LT Pickup Trucks following reports of 11 minor accidents. 2005 and 2006 models with 5.4 liter 3-valve engines are affected by the recall. [read post]
21 May 2015, 8:47 am by Rebecca Tushnet
”  Similarity (as long as there are also differences) between a mark and a parody may only enhance the parody’s effect, and the strong mark’s strength is the mechanism by which confusion is avoided. [read post]
29 Jan 2010, 12:12 am
The result may also be that a mark which has been used in the course of business in one member state only will fail to be regarded as genuinely used in revocation proceedings under Article 51 [Aha, says Merpel -- '51' is '15' in reverse!]. [read post]
23 Feb 2009, 4:15 am
Two websites showed trailer suspension systems and tires sold by the same retailer, but not under the same mark. [read post]
7 Sep 2010, 5:50 am by Brian Scott
Your trademark attorney may then advise you to file the name and logo together to ensure registration.2) In showing your mark (e.g. advertising, web site, tags or labels, etc.), the logo is ALWAYS shown with the name but the name is sometimes shown without the logo. [read post]
7 Dec 2017, 2:55 pm by Lawrence B. Ebert
But the latter conclusion does not followautomatically from the former finding, and additionalevidence may prevent drawing it. . . . [read post]