Search for: "ROBERTS V. UNITED STATES " Results 4841 - 4860 of 9,853
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
31 Dec 2008, 10:48 am
  Justice Ginsburg immediately pointed out that "the position of the only representative of the United States" in the court below was in fact opposite to the one taken by Ms. [read post]
27 Feb 2017, 5:10 pm by Kevin Johnson
Kagan complained that the United States had pointed to few sources with which to interpret the statute. [read post]
11 Nov 2022, 9:22 am by Howard M. Wasserman
Arguments of the United States Assistant to the Solicitor General Benjamin Snyder argued for the United States in support of neither party. [read post]
27 Jan 2012, 12:52 pm by Alison Rowe
; Case 4:09-CV-00456-A in the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas (Fort Worth Division). [read post]
3 Apr 2012, 6:32 am by Nabiha Syed
Finally, the Court invited the Solicitor General to file briefs expressing the views of the United States in two cases, Tarrant Regional Water District v. [read post]
23 Jun 2010, 10:31 am by Erin Miller
United States and McDonald v. [read post]
19 Jun 2018, 3:42 pm by Hans von Spakovsky
Roberts also observed in Gill that the Supreme Court looked at this issue in 2006 in League of United Latin American Citizens v. [read post]
5 Dec 2009, 9:52 am by Timothy P. Flynn
  He claims the objectionable government action was the issuance of a warrant; a warrant Ord claims was obtained by the police in bad faith.This spring (March 2010), the United States Supreme Court will hear oral argument in a gun-ordinance case from Illinois, McDonald -v- Chicago. [read post]
5 Dec 2009, 9:50 am by Timothy P. Flynn, Esq.
  He claims the objectionable government action was the issuance of a warrant; a warrant Ord claims was obtained by the police in bad faith.This spring (March 2010), the United States Supreme Court will hear oral argument on a gun-ordinance case from Illinois, McDonald -v- Chicago. [read post]
9 Dec 2010, 11:04 am by Peter Vodola
Co., 13 N.Y. 31 [1855]), and a few decades later the United States Supreme Court rejected it also (Grigsby v. [read post]
18 Jun 2018, 4:00 am by Walter Dellinger
Richard Nixon was so named in the Watergate indictment, and that inclusion was sustained by Judge John Sirica and defended by the United States in United States v. [read post]
9 Jul 2020, 7:51 am by Jonathan H. Adler
Jsutice Kavanaugh, joined by Justice Gorsuch, concurred in the judgment, arguing that the standard for a state criminal subpoena should be the "demonstrated, specific need" test adopted by the Court in United States v. [read post]
28 Jan 2007, 11:43 pm
United States, 517 U.S. 654, 661, 116 S.Ct. 1638, 134 L.Ed.2d 880 (1996), the Supreme Court stated that Rule 4's 120-day time period for service "operates not as an outer limit subject to reduction, but as an irreducible allowance. [read post]