Search for: "US v. Levelle Grant" Results 4841 - 4860 of 9,107
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Mar 2015, 8:00 am by The Public Employment Law Press
Evidence showed that the manager's work was not in final form, he did not conceal that he was using a template, and the use of templates were not forbidden by petitioner's rules. [read post]
11 Mar 2015, 7:32 am by Michael Geist
In other words, the existence of the provision at the provincial level tells us very little about how it will be used under PIPEDA.The reform here is clear. [read post]
11 Mar 2015, 6:09 am by Tim Sitzmann
However, the Fifth Circuit provided us with an interesting decision regarding potential liability for use of trademarks as part of gripe sites. [read post]
11 Mar 2015, 2:54 am
This case is Kelly-Brown v Winfrey, No. 11 cv 7875 (S.D.N.Y. [read post]
9 Mar 2015, 8:53 am
On one level, the granting of Aladdin’s wishes by the Genie is a lot like insurance coverage today. [read post]
9 Mar 2015, 6:47 am
Moreover, the factual allegations `must be enough to raise a right to relief above the speculative level’ such that the claim `is plausible on its face. [read post]
9 Mar 2015, 2:59 am by R. David Donoghue
Claims requiring that the expert systems use one or more of various modules did not rise to the level of an inventive concept at least because it did not specify how the expert system was required to use any of the modules. [read post]
8 Mar 2015, 5:09 pm by INFORRM
Calgary’s mayor has been granted a jury trial in a $6m defamation lawsuit. [read post]
7 Mar 2015, 10:15 am
Defenders of the administration’s position in King v. [read post]
5 Mar 2015, 6:24 pm by Joy Waltemath
The district court granted summary judgment for the sheriff, finding no constitutional violation. [read post]
5 Mar 2015, 6:07 pm
First, EPA and Iowa don’t consider districts a point source so there are no rules or standards for how to grant them permits to control discharges – like other point sources. [read post]
5 Mar 2015, 3:45 pm
  The Court found that Hakkasan had failed to show use of the Contested Domain Names by Miller that reached the same levels as those in the Bittorrent and Kreation Juicerycases. [read post]