Search for: "Billings v. United States"
Results 4861 - 4880
of 10,152
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Mar 2010, 4:30 am
Watson v. [read post]
31 Dec 1969, 4:00 pm
The bill, is the 100th amendment to the Indian constitution. [read post]
22 May 2015, 10:59 am
Just this week, however, the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit dismissed those concerns. [read post]
22 May 2015, 10:59 am
Just this week, however, the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit dismissed those concerns. [read post]
31 Dec 2013, 8:02 am
EFF cited a 6th Circuit case, US v. [read post]
31 May 2010, 8:23 am
Duxbury v. [read post]
29 Sep 2023, 10:31 pm
United States (which I discussed here), the Supreme Court yesterday decided to hear another Takings Clause case: Sheetz v. [read post]
28 Oct 2019, 11:31 am
United States, known as the “Microsoft Ireland,” case in which the U.S. [read post]
14 Aug 2020, 12:32 pm
Volokh also wrote that the Supreme Court’s United States v. [read post]
24 Feb 2016, 4:36 am
In Hall v. [read post]
24 Feb 2016, 4:36 am
In Hall v. [read post]
25 Sep 2009, 1:00 pm
" The Court focused on the Lilly Ledbetter Fair Pay Act in the ruling this month, a bill that extends the time period in which employees can pursue equal compensation lawsuits, and restores the law that existed for years in regions all over the United States, including Southern California, prior to the Ledbetter v. [read post]
27 Oct 2022, 5:55 am
Last month, the Senate Judiciary Committee held a public hearing on a proposed bill to expand the U.S. war crimes statute to allow the Department of Justice to prosecute foreign war criminals in the United States and a separate bill to allow the Department of Justice to prosecute individuals for crimes against humanity. [read post]
5 May 2010, 6:50 am
A supporter of this bill stated that it was intended to “address the Supreme Court's flawed decision in Riegel v. [read post]
25 May 2009, 1:37 am
[single citation] In a 2004 decision (SOCAN v. [read post]
31 Jul 2024, 3:56 am
In the United States, free speech is first and foremost a negative right of individuals against the government as reflected in the state action doctrine. [read post]
8 May 2008, 2:33 pm
Over the years, when deciding ex post facto cases, the United States Supreme Court has referred repeatedly to its ruling in the Calder v. [read post]
27 Mar 2012, 1:40 pm
United States v. [read post]
25 Jun 2012, 12:18 pm
United States, No. 11-182, did not foreclose further lawsuits based on that argument. [read post]
21 Jul 2022, 10:37 am
When cases of Zika and Ebola emerged in the United States, we did not tell patients, “you chose to travel to risky locations, so we will not help you with the consequences of your actions. [read post]
