Search for: "Claimant(s)" Results 4861 - 4880 of 26,250
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Jun 2012, 6:00 am by Patrick Babin
The DOL’s medical examiner assessed that the relationship between Claimants hearing loss and the noise exposure was possible, but not definite, because of Claimants pre-existing hearing issues. [read post]
14 Sep 2015, 2:02 pm by Cynthia Marcotte Stamer
The Act also allows for the recovery of double (or liquidated) damages and attorney’s fees for successful claimants. [read post]
14 Sep 2015, 2:02 pm by Cynthia Marcotte Stamer
The Act also allows for the recovery of double (or liquidated) damages and attorney’s fees for successful claimants. [read post]
29 Jan 2015, 5:30 am by The Public Employment Law Press
The ALJ ruled that because "claimant met multiple indicators to establish that her Niagara Falls residence was her actual principal residence under the law, . . . claimant did not violate the law; as established during the [CPLR] [a]rticle 78 proceeding, which resulted in the annulment of the claimant's termination. [read post]
24 Mar 2014, 8:10 am by Joy Waltemath
Based on Global’s admissions and the EEOC’s uncontroverted evidence, the court found that there was a genuine fact dispute as to whether the claimants engaged in protected activity. [read post]
26 Feb 2018, 1:00 am
 Notably, the ruling declared the woman's employer and insurance carrier to be "liable for all past present and future reasonable and necessary medical treatment related to claimants...deployment-related long disease ". [read post]
11 Dec 2013, 9:26 am by Gregorgy Dell
The Court notes that under applicable law "regular occupation" is not defined so narrowly as to include only the characteristics of [a claimant's] job, it must be defined as a position of the "same general character" as [a claimant's] job." [read post]
4 Nov 2014, 6:30 am by Michael B. Stack
  Under the terms of this program’s lower reimbursement rates, Ms. [read post]
31 Jul 2014, 6:30 am by Attorney Theodore Ronca
(We are in the process of celebrating our comp law’s hundredth anniversary this year.) [read post]
3 Oct 2012, 9:32 am by Greenberg & Bederman
" After examining 300 decisions by administrative law judges (ALJs) granting benefits to claimants, the Subcommittee concluded that ALJ’s are overburdened with cases and do not always consider all of the evidence when making decisions. [read post]
18 Jun 2020, 7:33 am by Karsner & Meehan, P.C.
Allegedly, in September 2015, the claimants employer filed a complaint asking to terminate the claimants disability benefits. [read post]
3 Nov 2021, 1:38 pm by Kevin LaCroix
  There are, as the paper details, numerous reasons why prospective claimants might seek to pursue these kinds of claims in U.S. court rather than in the courts of a company’s home country. [read post]
5 Oct 2015, 6:22 am by Jo Ann Hoffman & Associates, P.A.
 CMS will only review new WCMSA proposals that meet the following criteria: The claimant is a Medicare beneficiary and the total settlement amount is greater than $25,000.00; or The claimant has a reasonable expectation of Medicare enrollment within 30 months* of the settlement date and the anticipated total settlement amount for future medical expenses and disability/lost wages over the life or duration of the settlement agreement is expected to be greater than $250,000.00. *… [read post]
20 Feb 2023, 8:09 pm by Anika de Kock
During a match with a visiting school the claimant (Izak), playing for the visiting school team suffered a neck injury after being tackled by a player from the opposing team. [read post]
15 Mar 2007, 4:27 pm
The case is C-524/04 Test Claimants in the Thin Cap Group Litigation v. [read post]
26 Feb 2020, 4:38 pm by Maurer Law
In March 2016, plaintiff was working in a patient’s room when her feet became tangled in oxygen tubing and she fell on her left side. [read post]
27 Sep 2015, 6:56 am by Mark S. Humphreys
This case allows a claimant to have access to the file investigating the claim of an insured that is put together by the adjuster and the company. [read post]
15 Jan 2015, 10:07 am
In appealing the case to the Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania, the injured worker pointed out that the IRE examiner “agreed that surgery for Claimants elbow condition would ‘be a reasonable treatment option’ and . . . he did not disagree that there was a 25% chance that the surgery would help with Claimants problems. [read post]