Search for: "Companies A, B, and C" Results 4861 - 4880 of 12,893
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Jul 2017, 8:29 pm by Kelly Phillips Erb
Tom Graves (R-GA), says: None of the funds made available by this Act may be used by the Internal Revenue Service to implement or enforce section 5000A of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, section 6055 of such Code, section 1502(c)24 of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (Public Law 111-148), or any amendments made by section 1502(b) of such Act. [read post]
3 Jul 2017, 8:31 am by Rebecca Tushnet
DoubleVerify submitted, among other things, press reports concerning numerous lawsuits filed by media production companies against FilmOn, as well as complaints filed and injunctions entered in a number of federal district courts against FilmOn for copyright infringement. [read post]
30 Jun 2017, 9:22 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
The patent is assigned to Enzo and is central to separate ongoing lawsuits between Enzo and Hologic, Gen-Probe (now part of Hologic), Roche Molecular Systems, and Becton Dickinson.Enzo originally sued these companies and several others for allegedly infringing the '180 and other related patents. [read post]
29 Jun 2017, 7:28 am by Quinta Jurecic
 should be refused according to standard procedures. b.) [read post]
28 Jun 2017, 2:02 pm by Matthew Kahn
Exhibit C is a copy of the operating agreement of DMP International, LLC. [read post]
28 Jun 2017, 10:01 am by MBettman
He noted that “care and support” are not components of willful abandonment under R.C. 3107.07(B)(2)(c), as they are in section (B)(2)(b) of the same statute. [read post]
28 Jun 2017, 7:43 am by Dan Pinnington
Confirmation of completion of steps often required the transmission of paper, or that party A telephone party B, obtain an answer, and then make another phone call to party C to report the answer. [read post]
27 Jun 2017, 12:34 pm by Josh Blackman
Section 3(b) specifies six categories of people who were not subject to the travel ban, including lawful permanent residents, dual nations, and refugees who had already been admitted. [read post]
26 Jun 2017, 8:16 am by Howard Friedman
Nor may §6(b); that is, such a person may not be excluded pursuant to §6(b), even if the 50,000- person cap has been reached or exceeded. [read post]
25 Jun 2017, 7:37 pm by JP Sarmiento
” Thus, our office argued that our client-company is qualified as a non-profit research organization as defined in 8 C.F.R. 214.2(h)(19)(iii)(C) so it is exempt from the numerical limitation. [read post]
24 Jun 2017, 9:45 pm by Stephanie Poli
The policy Farmers issued to Plaintiffs was pretty straightforward, promising that in the event of a fire at the insured premises, Farmers would pay for: “c. [read post]
23 Jun 2017, 9:26 pm by Stephen Bilkis
The unique issue before the court is whether service of process upon the Public Administrator is sufficient to confer personal jurisdiction over an estate: (a) which petitioner claims is worth less than $10,000, (b) where no probate proceeding has been initiated and (c) where no letters of administration have been issued. [read post]
23 Jun 2017, 9:26 pm by Stephen Bilkis
The unique issue before the court is whether service of process upon the Public Administrator is sufficient to confer personal jurisdiction over an estate: (a) which petitioner claims is worth less than $10,000, (b) where no probate proceeding has been initiated and (c) where no letters of administration have been issued. [read post]
23 Jun 2017, 10:27 am by Chris Mirasola, Yishai Schwartz
This order comes in response to a 2014 government request for such an order after the companies refused to comply with the directives. [read post]