Search for: "Does 1 - 23"
Results 4861 - 4880
of 15,477
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Jan 2012, 5:01 pm
T 511/92).As the overall context of document D0 does not allow the skilled person to understand without doubt which of the two figures is correct, the distinguishing feature cannot be considered to be unambiguously disclosed.Therefore, the subject-matter of claim 1 is novel within the meaning of A 54(1)(2) EPC 1973 over the disclosure of document D0.Should you wish to download the whole decision (in German), just click here.The file wrapper can be found here. [read post]
18 Feb 2009, 10:31 pm
., 539 U.S. 23 (2003), to this claim. [read post]
20 Apr 2011, 4:54 pm
April 1 Guidance The FAQIV guidance jointly published April 1 by the Agencies helps to clarify certain aspects of the workings of the grandfathered health plan rules as construed and implemented under these Regulations. [read post]
20 Nov 2007, 8:55 am
SOURCES [1] Kal Raustiala & Christopher Sprigman, The Piracy Paradox: Innovation and Intellectual Property in Fashion Design, 92 VA. [read post]
6 Nov 2013, 9:12 pm
Nov. 4, 2013).Issues[1] LifeScan’s primary argument is that the distribution of its meters, whether by sale or gift, does not trigger exhaustion because its meters do not substantially embody the claims of the ’105 patent [per the requirements of the Supreme Court’s decision in Quanta]. [read post]
26 Dec 2006, 12:25 pm
How does the paternity test work? [read post]
17 May 2021, 10:27 am
An anti-SLAPP motion has two steps: (1) the defendant must show the challenged allegations or claims arise from protected activity, and if so (2) the plaintiff must show its claims have at least “minimal merit” in order for them to proceed. [read post]
14 Sep 2009, 8:07 am
Here is the companion article to "In Appreciation of Library Catalogers and Cataloging Standards" posted by me 7/23/09. [read post]
13 Apr 2010, 9:45 am
”[23] The FCA provides an important deterrent to overzealous pursuit of marginal or baseless lawsuits. [read post]
7 Dec 2018, 2:22 pm
§ 1016.3(q)(1). [read post]
14 Sep 2011, 6:53 am
[Continued from yesterday's Part 2 and the preceding Part 1.] [read post]
23 Nov 2015, 3:44 am
§1003.2(b)(1); see 8 U.S. [read post]
25 Dec 2011, 5:17 pm
However the extension does little to relieve employers from the wave of added regulatory and enforcement guidance including new social networking guidance issued coincident with the extension announcement. [read post]
2 Feb 2016, 12:55 pm
Defendants may take the opposite tack, but the important point is that the standard is epistemic and the Gettier problem[1] seriously afflicts most discussions in the legal state-of-art defenses. [read post]
27 Jul 2010, 3:33 pm
[para 23] Appeal allowed and possession order restored. [read post]
27 Jul 2010, 3:33 pm
[para 23] Appeal allowed and possession order restored. [read post]
24 Feb 2022, 1:57 pm
” Europe Austria Feb. 24 at 1:24 a.m. [read post]
19 Apr 2018, 12:38 pm
Finally, the court does do some civil cases from time to time. [read post]
23 Jul 2018, 6:16 am
Start here: 1. [read post]
23 Jun 2016, 1:23 am
Anderson does get one thing right. [read post]
