Search for: "ENGLISH v. STATE"
Results 4861 - 4880
of 7,358
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Feb 2017, 11:30 pm
In Dawson-Damer v. [read post]
16 Dec 2009, 5:01 am
The English courts could, and in appropriate cases should, determine at least the question of infringement of foreign copyright. [read post]
1 Jul 2020, 3:22 pm
Citing Marbury v. [read post]
9 Dec 2009, 4:43 am
"Oyez" is sort of an old English tradition. [read post]
28 Feb 2007, 4:38 am
Accordingly, the question whether and in what circumstances the English court has jurisdiction is to be determined according to the provisions of … the Brussels Regulation. [read post]
23 Jan 2012, 2:53 pm
The English speaking Caribbean inherited much of its cultural norms and its legal system from the British colonizers, so that just like the United States, it has a common law system which is a direct descendant of the English common law system and some of the countries still have close ties to the British since they retain the Privy council as their final court of appeal, others have opted to have the newly created Caribbean Court of Justice as their final Court of Appeal.… [read post]
25 Aug 2015, 7:38 am
In 1825, Wayman v. [read post]
20 Aug 2011, 2:45 pm
State of A.P. [read post]
22 Feb 2023, 4:47 am
As per the guidance in R v Secretary of State, chambers should identify one named clerk responsible for communicating the draft judgment from the court to the relevant barristers. [read post]
30 Mar 2017, 7:00 am
The Crown, as a representative of the state, on the other hand, has no duty to the victim. [read post]
20 Mar 2011, 11:55 pm
Indeed, after 1975 the Court delivered a series of landmark judgments, including, for example, Golder v UK (1975), Engel v the Netherlands (1976), Tyrer v UK (1978), Marckx v Belgium (1979) and Sunday Times v UK (1979). [read post]
25 Jan 2011, 8:45 am
Complaints can also be made in languages other than English. [read post]
10 Jul 2008, 6:46 pm
Co. v. [read post]
7 Jun 2010, 8:45 am
Lucia) Limited et al v. [read post]
24 Jan 2011, 9:56 pm
INTA filed a brief in Nokia Corporation v. [read post]
7 Jun 2010, 8:45 am
Lucia) Limited et al v. [read post]
25 Apr 2009, 3:21 am
The case is Northwest Austin Municipal Utility District v. [read post]
18 Jun 2007, 8:24 am
I was also interested to read a decision of the English courts in a controversial case, R v Health Secretary ex parte US Tobacco [1992] 1 QB 353 where a factory was set up to manufacture ‘oral snuff’ based on some assurances from the Department of Health, who subsequently banned its sale! [read post]
25 Jul 2018, 11:05 am
In Brady v. [read post]
