Search for: "Green v. State"
Results 4861 - 4880
of 6,119
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Jul 2015, 3:12 pm
In Young v. [read post]
9 Aug 2013, 7:13 am
Rigidity v. flexibility: advocates for more specific defenses. [read post]
7 Aug 2014, 3:42 pm
Koons, Prince, Sega, Green Day. [read post]
16 Nov 2009, 4:51 am
(Class 99) United States US General Wisconsin judge vacates $ 1.26 billion judgment in default against PepsiCo (IPKat) (IP Factor) California Court of Appeal: Von Dutch tradename settlement gives rise to legal malpractice action and questionable mediation confidentiality decision: Michael Cassel v Superior Court of Los Angeles County (The IP ADR Blog) US Patent Reform Putting the USPTO to work for independent inventors (Director's Forum) (Inventive Step) (IP Asset Maximizer… [read post]
6 May 2011, 5:43 am
The light was green for Doran . . . [read post]
16 Nov 2009, 4:51 am
Becton Dickinson (EDTexweblog.com) District Court E D New York: Federal police power trumps patent law: IRIS Corporation v Japan Airlines (IP Frontline) Delaware Court: Honeywell patents on LCDs nixed: court dismisses claim of patent infringement: Honeywell v Fujifilm and Samsung (Managing IP) District Court W D of Wisconsin denies motion claim for claim construction in full: Semiconductor Energy Lab Co v Samsung Elecs. [read post]
16 Nov 2009, 4:51 am
(Class 99) United States US General Wisconsin judge vacates $ 1.26 billion judgment in default against PepsiCo (IPKat) (IP Factor) California Court of Appeal: Von Dutch tradename settlement gives rise to legal malpractice action and questionable mediation confidentiality decision: Michael Cassel v Superior Court of Los Angeles County (The IP ADR Blog) US Patent Reform Putting the USPTO to work for independent inventors (Director's Forum) (Inventive Step) (IP Asset Maximizer… [read post]
6 Jun 2014, 8:50 am
Supreme Court set up a procedure in Anders v. [read post]
29 Mar 2021, 7:10 pm
One New Jersey appellate court upheld the disqualification of an expert witness who had worked for the State of New Jersey on a case that involved confidential disclosures by the State’s lawyers and its agencies, which disclosures were necessarily involved in the expert witness’s subsequent retention by the State’s adversary in a different case.[10] This decision, like most in this area, turned on a close analysis of the facts and circumstances of the… [read post]
16 Jan 2009, 7:00 am
You can separately subscribe to the IP Think Tank Global Week in Review at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com] Highlights this week included: CAFC: In re Comiskey rehearing en banc falls two votes short; important dissent by Moore J (Hal Wegner) (Inventive Step) (Patently-O) (Washington State Patent Law Blog) (Peter Zura's 271 Patent Blog) (Law360) (Patent Prospector) District Court Delaware: Document shredding voids 12 Rambus patents: Rambus v Micron… [read post]
29 Sep 2016, 4:46 am
EU Regulations are directly effective in all member states. [read post]
9 Aug 2016, 12:45 pm
Bellovin, Josh Benaloh, Matt Blaze, Whitfield Diffie, John Gilmore, Matthew Green, Susan Landau, Peter G. [read post]
23 Mar 2020, 7:08 am
Having worked for a legal aid organization that serves the arts community in my state, this Kat has learned that the intersection of arts and law provides a variety of unique insights and challenges. [read post]
25 Apr 2014, 12:44 pm
We had the opportunity to talk about how the Free Software Foundation is one of the 22 plaintiffs in our First Unitarian Church of Los Angeles v. [read post]
14 Jan 2019, 3:53 am
The Board noted that Qualitex (green press pad) and Owens-Corning (pink insulation) involved a single color applied to a product. [read post]
9 Dec 2021, 6:25 am
”For the complaint:https://www.eff.org/document/alhathloul-v-darkmatter For more on state-sponsored malware:https://www.eff.org/issues/state-sponsored-malware Contact: KarenGulloAnalyst, Senior Media Relations Specialistkaren@eff.org [read post]
29 Oct 2024, 4:00 am
It should be remebered that only Justice Thomas resorted to originalism in SFFA v. [read post]
31 Oct 2014, 8:43 am
In Lirette v. [read post]
25 Nov 2010, 4:08 pm
The general rule against prior restraint in defamation has survived the HRA: Greene v Associated Newspapers [2005] QB 972. [read post]
13 Oct 2024, 1:20 pm
Elsewhere, I have explained why Founding-era understandings of "invasion" are limited to large-scale armed attacks, and do not cover things like illegal migration or drug smuggling (for more detail, see my amicus brief in United States v. [read post]
