Search for: "HARMS v. HARMS" Results 4861 - 4880 of 36,765
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Jul 2013, 1:34 pm by WIMS
The plaintiffs argue neither that the project as a whole is contrary to the public interest nor that it was sectioned in order to prevent consideration of its total environmental harms. . .They may be playing a delay game: make the Corps do a public interest analysis from the ground up (along with an all-at-once six-section permit analysis) in the hope that at least until the analysis is completed there will be no further construction, so that until then the highway will end at… [read post]
25 Jan 2012, 1:24 pm by Larkin Reynolds
As Jack and Steve have both noted, yesterday the Fourth Circuit issued its opinion in Lebron v. [read post]
27 Dec 2023, 5:25 am by SHG
Eastern District of North Carolina Judge Richard Myers in Nutt v. [read post]
30 Jul 2008, 7:30 am
Multiple sources are now reporting that the DLSE has already updated its materials to require hearing officers to follow Brinker Restaurant Corporation, et al. v. [read post]
24 May 2011, 8:40 am by Cathyrn Hopkins, Olswang LLP
On 9 March 2011, the Supreme Court handed down its judgment in the joint appeal of Sienkiewicz v Grief (UK) Ltd; Knowsley MBC v Willmore [2011] UKSC 10. [read post]