Search for: "High v State"
Results 4861 - 4880
of 35,512
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Oct 2021, 12:07 pm
Jackson and United States v. [read post]
30 Oct 2021, 10:15 am
The notice cited the Karnataka High Court’s decision in Virendra Khanna v State of Karnataka, wherein the court held that searches of mobile phones require a judicial warrant unless there is an ongoing investigation and there are documented reasons to justify such intervention. [read post]
30 Oct 2021, 7:06 am
The Delhi High Court issued a notice Thursday asking the Reserve Bank of India (RBI), the National Payments Corporation of India (NPCI), and State Bank of India (SBI) to respond to a petition seeking revocation of the prohibition on using the Unified Payment Interface (UPI) System for cryptocurrency transactions in the country. [read post]
29 Oct 2021, 2:03 pm
North Dakota v. [read post]
29 Oct 2021, 11:06 am
Jackson and United States v. [read post]
29 Oct 2021, 9:05 am
Supreme Stalemates: Chalices, Jack-O’-Lanterns, and Other State High Court Tiebreakers, 169 U. [read post]
29 Oct 2021, 5:24 am
Wade and Planned Parenthood v. [read post]
27 Oct 2021, 7:51 am
The case, New York State Rifle & Pistol Association v. [read post]
27 Oct 2021, 7:10 am
In a division of property and assets case captioned Roth v. [read post]
27 Oct 2021, 5:21 am
Mr Duan agreed and noted that the anti-suit injunctions are also hardly enforceable, and merely act to put companies into uncertainty and dilemma with the national courts – there are few cases where they have actually been enforced. [1] Unwired Planet International Ltd v Huawei Technologies Co Ltd and others [2020] UKSC 37 [2] Optis Cellular Technology, LLC, et al. v. [read post]
27 Oct 2021, 5:21 am
Mr Duan agreed and noted that the anti-suit injunctions are also hardly enforceable, and merely act to put companies into uncertainty and dilemma with the national courts – there are few cases where they have actually been enforced. [1] Unwired Planet International Ltd v Huawei Technologies Co Ltd and others [2020] UKSC 37 [2] Optis Cellular Technology, LLC, et al. v. [read post]
26 Oct 2021, 9:01 pm
Although Texas seeks to use the law and the litigation over it as a vehicle for overturning Roe v. [read post]
26 Oct 2021, 9:01 pm
Although Texas seeks to use the law and the litigation over it as a vehicle for overturning Roe v. [read post]
26 Oct 2021, 4:48 pm
” (Citing Tinsley v. [read post]
26 Oct 2021, 2:52 pm
Callow Inc. v. [read post]
26 Oct 2021, 2:07 pm
Supreme Court case United Health Services v. [read post]
26 Oct 2021, 9:13 am
This is exactly the scenario that took place in the case of Oshidar v. [read post]
26 Oct 2021, 9:13 am
This is exactly the scenario that took place in the case of Oshidar v. [read post]
26 Oct 2021, 3:55 am
According to Li v. [read post]
26 Oct 2021, 2:42 am
A recent paper highlights the extent of these D&O claim risks in the United States. [read post]
