Search for: "IN RE T A G" Results 4861 - 4880 of 7,052
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Jun 2011, 2:36 pm
nda, 223 üncü Maddeye göre verilen karar? [read post]
17 Jun 2011, 9:53 am by Susan Brenner
That wasn’t the case under the scenario that at least potentially arose from Demiro’s Rule 41(g) motion. [read post]
16 Jun 2011, 6:43 pm by Adam Levitin
And as a recent 9th Circuit BAP opinion, In re Veal (about which I hope to blog more) noted (fn 25), bearer paper has long had lots of nefarious associations (I would add Godfather III to the bearer bonds movie list in that note). [read post]
16 Jun 2011, 2:45 pm by Howard Knopf
Gilles McDougallSecretary General | Secrétaire généralCopyright Board of Canada | Commission du droit d'auteur du Canada56 Sparks, Suite| Bureau 800Ottawa ON K1A 0C9Telephone | Téléphone 613.952.8624Gilles.mcdougall@cb-cda.gc.ca **************************************************HK [read post]
16 Jun 2011, 2:21 pm by Joe Koncelik
Now on behalf of their clients, they're saying the exact opposite. [read post]
16 Jun 2011, 5:38 am by Jack Goldsmith
  Even if this interpretation were correct, it would not apply here because (a) there have not been intermittent reports re-starting the clock, perhaps because (b) strikes here have been more or less continuous. [read post]
15 Jun 2011, 6:46 am
Merpel's most impressed -- she can't think of any other words that have the sequence of letters g-h-t-k in the middle of them. [read post]
14 Jun 2011, 6:51 am by admin
Si l’économie s’améliore, la valeur de la propriété augmente, ce qui augmente vos taxes foncières. [read post]
13 Jun 2011, 3:01 pm by Eugene Volokh
Portillo-Munoz, a divided Fifth Circuit panel holds that illegal aliens don’t have Second Amendment rights because they’re not part of “the people,” and suggests that they may lack Fourth Amendment rights as well. [read post]
13 Jun 2011, 4:14 am by Marie Louise
(EPLAW) Cheapflights: OHIM excludes likelihood of confusion between conflicting signs, due to very low degree of distinctive character of earlier marks: T-460/09; T-461/09  (Class 46) General Court upholds opposition brought  by PEPE JEANS against PEPEQUILLO CTM application: T-580/08 (Class 46) Royal treatment rejected in Luxembourg: T-397/09 (Class 46) ‘G’: Emram v OHIM: Guilty against Gucci (Class 46) General Court: summer time I… [read post]
12 Jun 2011, 4:59 pm by Larry Downes
So radical re-thinking of spectrum management is urgent. [read post]
11 Jun 2011, 10:50 am by Kelly Phillips Erb
Image by KeithBurtis via Flickr The bizarre saga involving former Hollywood tax attorney Matthew G. [read post]