Search for: "MATTER OF B T B" Results 4861 - 4880 of 19,798
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Jan 2020, 1:19 pm by Giles Peaker
So, landlords, if you did breach the deposit rules, and you know you did, try to come to a quick settlement with the tenant rather than bluff your way out of it, no matter what you think about the fairness of the situation. [read post]
10 Jan 2020, 11:56 am by Jonathan Shaub
The article then goes on to list three actions as the basis for that charge: (a) directing the White House to defy a subpoena for documents; (b) directing executive branch agencies and offices to defy subpoenas for documents; and (c) directing current and former executive branch officials “not to cooperate with the Committees” and to defy subpoenas for testimony. [read post]
9 Jan 2020, 3:30 pm by Giles Peaker
As yet these aren’t up on the justice.gov.uk site, and while I’ve seen the revised versions, I can’t link to them or add a file. [read post]
9 Jan 2020, 2:53 pm by Lloyd J. Jassin
From a legal perspective, where the  arrow lands - not where you intended it to fall - is what matters. [read post]
9 Jan 2020, 2:53 pm by Lloyd J. Jassin
From a legal perspective, where the  arrow lands - not where you intended it to fall - is what matters. [read post]
9 Jan 2020, 2:53 pm by Copylaw
From a legal perspective, where the  arrow lands - not where you intended it to fall - is what matters. [read post]
8 Jan 2020, 9:29 am by Phil Dixon
The State therefore failed to meet its burden and the matter was vacated and remanded for resentencing. [read post]
8 Jan 2020, 9:14 am by David Bernstein
Appx. 556 (9th Cir. 2018), though you won't learn many of the facts of the case from reading that opinion. [read post]
8 Jan 2020, 4:28 am
The question at the pleading stage, which is the stage of the current case, is a question of whether the matters that are pleaded are capable of being matters which ought to form part of the trial. [read post]
7 Jan 2020, 5:41 am by Nicole Pottroff
In reaching its decision, GAO explained, “[t]he issue of whether personnel identified in an offeror’s proposal, [will] in fact, perform under the subsequently-awarded contract is generally a matter of contract administration that our Office does not review. [read post]
7 Jan 2020, 2:10 am by Roel van Woudenberg
In this communication, the Examining Division held that the subject-matter of the independent claims on file lacked inventive step in the sense of Article 56 EPC.III. [read post]
7 Jan 2020, 1:58 am
Therefore, the decision could not stand, and the matters were reconsidered.Consent and second-hand salesBoth parties agreed that there was no express consent but the Applicant argued that there was implied consent (relimg on The Sunrider Corp v OHIM EU Case T-203/02 as establishing that implied consent would qualify). [read post]