Search for: "MATTER OF T H"
Results 4861 - 4880
of 6,322
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Jan 2011, 11:53 am
I really don’t. [read post]
24 Jan 2011, 5:00 am
As a threshold matter, the Court first discussed whether each was “an employee of a governmental unit” within the scope of § 101.106(f). [read post]
23 Jan 2011, 11:25 pm
Doesn't matter. [read post]
23 Jan 2011, 2:57 pm
www.eloqui.biz T: 818-225-7991 or 818-225-7992 Check 'em out. [read post]
23 Jan 2011, 6:06 am
But I’m a lawyer, not a miracle worker (H/T to @obxlaw), so be patient. [read post]
22 Jan 2011, 6:05 pm
Ra him and Raya H. [read post]
21 Jan 2011, 4:22 pm
For instance, the typical phrasing I’d use in a rent arrears set off situation in the Schedule to a Tomlin (shorn of irrrelevant bits) would be: L to pay T £X by: i) paying £(amount of current arrears) to T’s rent account ii) paying £(balance) to T’s solicitors What this makes clear is that T’s rent liability remains, but that a payment has been made to the rent account as part of the settlement. [read post]
21 Jan 2011, 4:22 pm
He was initially refused HB under regulation 9(1)(h) of the Housing Benefit (Persons who have attained the qualifying age for state pension credit) Regulations 2006 [which I'm not going into]. [read post]
21 Jan 2011, 2:59 am
"H/T Radley Balko © 2011 Simple Justice NY LLC. [read post]
20 Jan 2011, 2:56 am
On what planet does Jerry H. [read post]
19 Jan 2011, 2:12 pm
Attorney General Eric H. [read post]
19 Jan 2011, 6:02 am
By Steven G. [read post]
18 Jan 2011, 8:46 pm
Even something as skeletal as that would be far better than leaving counsel in the awkward position of having to tell a client that despite the fees paid, the case was dismissed, and that he really doesn’t know exactly why, since the Court didn’t say. h/t: A Georgia Lawyer and Erin Russell Share this on Facebook Tweet This! [read post]
18 Jan 2011, 12:15 pm
Gov’t Code § 12651(a)(8). [read post]
18 Jan 2011, 3:30 am
It matters to me. [read post]
17 Jan 2011, 4:22 pm
H. [read post]
17 Jan 2011, 4:16 pm
-Vaughn H. [read post]
14 Jan 2011, 10:07 am
Legally speaking, it doesn’t matter whether the number of states challenging the law is twenty-six or two. [read post]
14 Jan 2011, 9:13 am
Would the federal government recognize that marriage as a matter of comity? [read post]
13 Jan 2011, 2:52 pm
It also passed H. [read post]
