Search for: "New York v. Class" Results 4861 - 4880 of 5,839
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Jul 2008, 5:04 pm
New York (1998) nor failed to establish intelligible guidelines as to when the agency could invoke the waiver. [read post]
24 Jun 2018, 4:41 pm by INFORRM
Surveillance Blog Law Online has an article considering US government’s surveillance in light of the Justice Department accessing the phone records and emails of New York Times reporter Ali Watkin’s. [read post]
16 Sep 2024, 12:19 pm by Will Yeatman
Bank of America, involving a New York law that was nearly identical to the California statute at issue in Lusnak and Kivett I. [read post]
26 Jun 2013, 12:37 pm by Randy Barnett
  (“DOMA seeks to injure the very class New York seeks to protect” [20]) Therefore, the Court will use heightened scrutiny to evaluate the rationality of DOMA’s imposed definition of marriage (“ In determining whether a law is motived by an improper animus or purpose, ‘[d]iscriminations of an unusual character’ especially require careful consideration. [read post]
10 Jan 2022, 4:01 pm by INFORRM
Judgement was handed down by Dame Sharp, Lauing LJ and Warby LJ in Soriano v Forensic News LLC & ors [2021] EWCA Civ 1952 on 21 December 2021. [read post]
19 Jan 2018, 6:30 am
Jung (New York University), and Min Park (The Ohio State University), on Tuesday, January 16, 2018 Tags: Acquisitions, Capital allocation, Disclosure, Financial reporting, Innovation, Private equity, R&D, Venture capital firms 2017 Year in Review: Securities Litigation and Regulation Posted by Jason Halper, Kyle DeYoung and Adam Magid, Cadwalader, Wickersham and Taft LLP, on Tuesday, January 16, 2018 Tags: CHOICE… [read post]
5 Apr 2010, 10:23 am by Eugene Volokh
President Obama’s serving as an editor of the Harvard Law Review is amply documented in publications — including the New York Times, the Washington Post, the Boston Globe — from the early 1990s, including when Obama was still a student. [read post]
3 Mar 2020, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar
” Thus, the statute prevents a state or local government from having a policy or practice that forbids maintaining or giving to the feds information on the immigration status of individuals.Various public entities, including the States of New York and Virginia, sued the federal government, arguing that it is illegal for the DOJ to require them to comply with § 1373 (and other, related immigration-assistance conditions) in order to be eligible for Byrne-grant funding. [read post]
9 Dec 2008, 7:16 pm
  The argument is illogical on its face, but has been accepted by quite a few state courts, including -- to the utter shame ofmy home state -- the abysmally reasoned decision by the New York Court of Appeals from two years ago. [read post]
14 Mar 2007, 10:24 pm
  "[V]ery bad…for the law firms that pay them, for the associates who receive them, for the clients who foot the bill for them, and for the society we serve. . . the higher salaries are wasted dollars. [read post]
26 Mar 2017, 4:06 pm by INFORRM
 There was a comment about the decision in the New York Times. [read post]
29 Aug 2011, 11:04 pm by JP
The New York times claimed that lawmakers hoped to raise some $44 million from the tax. [read post]
21 Dec 2011, 4:57 am by Susan Brenner
The New York Times, for example, called it a “case with potentially far-reaching consequences for freedom of expression on the Internet”. [read post]
21 Jan 2025, 1:23 pm by Phil Dixon
Supreme Court’s decision in New York Rifle and Pistol Ass’n, Inc. v. [read post]
27 Dec 2011, 6:13 am by Kiera Flynn
RGH Liquidating Trust  Docket: 11-510   Issue: Whether the New York Court of Appeals correctly derived from the “Counting of Certain Class Members” provision of the Securities Litigation Uniform Standards Act (SLUSA) a “single-entity exemption” under which a state-law securities fraud action that indisputably was brought on behalf of more than fifty bondholders and would otherwise be precluded by SLUSA is permissible so long as… [read post]
20 Jan 2014, 12:28 am by Kevin LaCroix
In support of its position, the insurer relied on case law (including the Seventh Circuit’s 2001 opinion in Level 3 Communications Inc. v. [read post]