Search for: "Sales, C. v. Sales, S." Results 4861 - 4880 of 6,067
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Oct 2018, 6:50 am by Eric Goldman
Section 110(c)(5) should be deleted. 1798.120(c): The language is inconsistent about 16 year olds (or, if you read the restriction as applying only to 14 and 15 year olds, then it’s inconsistent about 13 year olds): “a business shall not sell the personal information of consumers if the business has actual knowledge that the consumer is less than 16 years of age, unless the consumer, in the case of consumers between 13 and 16 years of age, or the… [read post]
22 Jan 2024, 9:01 pm by renholding
You are probably well acquainted with its successor, rule 506.[2] Prior to the adoption of former rule 146 in April 1974, the Commission did not have rules interpreting section 4(2) of the Securities Act.[3] As a result, issuers faced uncertainty in determining whether a sale of securities did not involve “any public offering” and in applying case law on the topic, including the Supreme Court’s decision in SEC v. [read post]
15 Nov 2013, 8:01 am by Evan Brown (@internetcases)
Finally, on the fourth fair use factor — effect on the market — the court rejected plaintiff’s arguments that the scanning and display will negatively affect the sale of plaintiff’s works. [read post]
16 Nov 2020, 5:42 am by Jonathan Fitchen
This minority view was based on a different interpretation of the facts and on the Giuliano and Lagarde Report on the Convention on the law applicable to contractual obligations (OJ EU No C 282-1). [read post]
27 Dec 2010, 6:34 pm by Gustavo Arballo
Texto destacado: "Yo prefiero bancarme todas las consignas fachas de los familiares de las víctimas del delito a vivir en un país que naturalice la muerte violenta en cualquiera de sus formas. [read post]
2 Jun 2022, 3:00 am by Kurt R. Karst
  Since 1984, generic drugs have been approved under ANDAs pursuant to section 505(j) of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (FDCA); before 1984, no formal mechanism for an ANDA existed so FDA used sections 505(b) and 505(c) to approve follow-on drugs based on the Agency’s previous findings of safety and efficacy. [read post]
4 Apr 2008, 1:00 am
- Counterfeit cash flooding the market: (Afro-IP), Debranded fakes for Liberia: an update: (Afro-IP), South African music industry blames pirates for falling sales of local artists: (Afro-IP), Plaintiff obtains interlocutory relief in patent case Sanitam Services Limited v Bins (Nairobi) Services Limited: (Afro-IP), South Africa – new patent judgments: Buckman Laboratories v Bromine Compounds; Northpark Trading 3 (Pty) Ltd v Ausplow (Pty)… [read post]
24 May 2007, 10:40 am
Eddins & Lee Bus Sales, Inc., 491 So.2d 942, 944 (Ala. 1986); Jones v. [read post]
23 Dec 2008, 2:57 pm
Shor, No. 07-2334 A sentence for conspiracy to distribute ecstasy is affirmed where the district court correctly calculated his sentence in adding a criminal history point pursuant to U.S.S.G. section 4A1.1(c) based on defendant's prior sentence for an assault with a dangerous weapon that resulted in a two-year probationary sentence imposed under Michigan's Holmes Youthful Trainee Act. . [read post]