Search for: "State v. Brown" Results 4861 - 4880 of 8,850
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Jan 2024, 10:01 am by Robin E. Kobayashi
A Connecticut appellate court affirmed a decision by the state’s Compensation Review Board that affirmed a decision by the Workers’ Compensation Commissioner dismissing a former employee’s claim for benefits related to injuries sustained when the former employee lit the wick of a small brown sphere and it exploded. [read post]
17 Oct 2013, 5:00 am by Bexis
  Comment k could correspond to Led Zeppelin, and state of the art might be The Who.And it seems that, for each of these bands, there’s a song we really like that gets slighted (in our opinion) when it comes to air time on classic rock stations. [read post]
15 Apr 2011, 6:02 am by Bexis
  We, of course think that's wrong under Erie - where the default should be, if a form of liability hasn't been recognized by a state court, then it should be dismissed by a federal court applying that state's law in a diversity action.ConnecticutIn Gerrity v. [read post]
8 Jan 2009, 12:53 pm
"  To support this, he relied on Brown Shoe Co. v. [read post]
4 Nov 2010, 4:45 pm by Mike
  Judge Saundra Brown Armstrong had an excellent explanation of lis pendens: Federal courts look to state law regarding in matters pertaining to lis pendens. [read post]
27 Jun 2011, 12:00 pm by Kali Borkoski
 Finally, in United States v. [read post]
In vetoing AB 1017, Governor Brown stated that we should wait and see whether last year’s momentous Fair Pay Act, SB 358, addressed the pay equity issue before making further changes. [read post]
25 May 2011, 2:30 am
Supreme Court's order to release tens of thousands of California inmates.That order came Monday, in the Court's 5-to-4 decision in Brown v. [read post]
19 Jul 2007, 2:25 am
In late June, the United States SC decided Seattle School Dsitrict, a judgment that has partially overruled Brown v. [read post]
4 Mar 2009, 1:02 pm
(for the Court) stated at ¶ 17: Having regard to the terminology adopted by Madam Justice McLachlin in  Young v. [read post]