Search for: "State v. David."
Results 4861 - 4880
of 14,260
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Mar 2017, 9:01 pm
In one, Chizmar v. [read post]
13 Mar 2017, 2:46 pm
Griffis states that p-values are expressed as percentages “usually 95% or 99%, corresponding to 0.05 or 0.01,” but this states things backwards. [read post]
13 Mar 2017, 1:01 am
” In 1931 the Idaho upheld the 1929 law in State v. [read post]
12 Mar 2017, 5:56 pm
This category seeks to address the facts at issue in Kerry v. [read post]
12 Mar 2017, 5:03 pm
” Alex Spence at Buzzfeed has uncovered the fact that the Telegraph hired Sir David Eady, who they described as “the judge who stops us from knowing the truth,” to conduct a secret internal inquiry. [read post]
11 Mar 2017, 7:01 am
Supreme Court in EEOC v. [read post]
10 Mar 2017, 3:50 pm
In People v. [read post]
10 Mar 2017, 3:50 pm
In People v. [read post]
10 Mar 2017, 3:22 pm
In Nesbitt v. [read post]
9 Mar 2017, 9:06 am
David Topkins; and (ii) Case 3:15-cr-00419-WHO, United States of America v. [read post]
9 Mar 2017, 3:03 am
In NVR, Inc. v. [read post]
8 Mar 2017, 9:01 pm
United States or Printz v. [read post]
6 Mar 2017, 4:26 pm
David Topol Margaret Thomas In its June 2010 decision in Morrison v. [read post]
6 Mar 2017, 10:00 am
The Supreme Court warned in McCreary County v. [read post]
6 Mar 2017, 7:11 am
State v. [read post]
3 Mar 2017, 9:30 am
” And finally, on January 20, 2017, in apparent accordance with Article II, Section I, Clause 8, “Before he enter[ed] on the execution of his office, he [took] the following oath or affirmation:—‘I do solemnly swear . . . that I will faithfully execute the office of President of the United States, and will to the best of my ability, preserve, protect and defend the Constitution of the United States. [read post]
3 Mar 2017, 6:16 am
Companies Posted by Jennifer V. [read post]
3 Mar 2017, 4:09 am
The justices issued an opinion on Wednesday in Bethune-Hill v. [read post]
2 Mar 2017, 9:30 pm
The executive order, which is the first step in what is expected to be a very lengthy process to rewrite the rule, instructs EPA to rewrite the rule so that the definition of navigable waters is consistent with the standard set out by Justice Scalia in the 2006 case Rapanos v. [read post]
2 Mar 2017, 8:45 pm
That individual is appellant-defendant David Guggenheim Birnbaum, who respectfully submits that, in light of all the circumstances, the answer to the above question cannot possibly be in the affirmative. [read post]
