Search for: "State v. Mai" Results 4861 - 4880 of 133,193
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Apr 2012, 7:01 am by david
Texas tells the story of the case, 539 U.S. 558 (2003), that struck down remaining state laws that criminalized consensual same-sex sexual activity and overturned Bowers v. [read post]
2 Jul 2019, 4:09 pm by INFORRM
“Likely” in this context normally means “more likely than not”, though a lesser prospect of success may suffice where the Court needs a short time to consider evidence/argument, or where the adverse consequences of publication might be extremely serious: Cream Holdings Ltd v Banerjee [2005] 1 AC 253 [16]-[23] (Lord Nicholls); ABC v Telegraph Media Group Ltd [2018] EWCA Civ 2329 [2019] EMLR 5 [16]. [read post]
24 Feb 2011, 7:02 am by Bob Fraser
  The 2008 Superior Court of Quebec decision in Teitelbaum v. 9093-8119 Quebec Inc. and the 1980 Ontario Supreme Court decision in Royal Bank of Canada v. [read post]
15 May 2013, 6:55 am by Joel R. Brandes
Justice Richter found that the Supreme Court ignored its own custody schedule when it stated that the parents here shared “very nearly equal” physical custody of the child. [read post]
24 Apr 2022, 9:16 am by Eric Goldman
The ruling also reinforces the possibility Facebook may have overestimated its cleverness by flipping on FOSTA and encouraging plaintiffs to sue it. [read post]
12 Feb 2008, 9:08 pm
Noriega's case will be heard by the 11th Circuit Court of Appeals on January 14, 2009.The Editor interviews Miami Attorney Jon May, who represented General Manuel Noriega at trial and on appeal (along with Attorney Frank Rubino).Some background: In United States v. [read post]
6 Jul 2022, 9:25 am by Josh Blackman
He may have thought that the federal eminent domain power was distinct, while the Article I military powers were governed by Alden v. [read post]
13 Mar 2019, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Courts may not interfere with an administrative tribunal's proper exercise of its discretionMatter of Seebald v New York State Div. of Human Rights and Roswell Park Cancer Inst. [read post]
13 Mar 2019, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Courts may not interfere with an administrative tribunal's proper exercise of its discretionMatter of Seebald v New York State Div. of Human Rights and Roswell Park Cancer Inst. [read post]