Search for: "State v. P. B." Results 4861 - 4880 of 6,785
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Jul 2015, 9:10 am by David
Rep. 112-98, at p. 54 (June 1, 2011) (emphases added). [read post]
8 Jun 2009, 8:16 pm
(b)           The admitting nurse shall formulate a plan of care (POC) stating the risk of falling and if the patient is at risk, then nurse shall implement reasonable specific reasonable nursing actions to prevent falling including but not limited to the following:                      … [read post]
28 Mar 2018, 1:18 pm by Richard Hunt
 The advertiser itself may be violating the general prohibition on discrimination in subsection 3604(b), but as long as the advertisements standing alone do not discriminate the media outlet that distributes it is ordinarily safe. [read post]
27 Jul 2016, 2:59 pm by Doorey
 A sectoral determination by the OLRB would precede any application for certification. b. [read post]
29 Mar 2012, 4:19 pm by Moshe (Thomas A.) Sharon, R.N., M.P.H.
These authors state that they based their debate on “four ethical principles associated with the DNP: (a) social responsibility, (b) respect for persons, (c) do no harm, and (d) justice as fairness. [read post]
26 Feb 2023, 5:48 pm by Michael Lowe
Created by the Sentencing Reform Act found within the Comprehensive Crime Control Act of 1984, the Supreme Court of the United States approved its authority in Mistretta v. [read post]
20 Sep 2011, 10:01 am by WSLL
CiteID=464400Appeal from the District Court of Natrona County, Honorable David B. [read post]
19 Jan 2011, 8:46 am by WSLL
State, 988 P.2d 1071 (Wyo. 1999)), the tip in the present action was not anonymous. [read post]
16 Apr 2007, 2:20 am
Gifford, Casper, Wyoming; Darin B. [read post]
16 Oct 2014, 1:27 pm by Glenn
Even before the landmark United States v. [read post]
20 Dec 2009, 8:37 am by Pamela Pengelley
Copyright Act   In the United States, the concept of fair use has now been set out in section 107 of the Copyright Act (Title 17 of the United States Code). [read post]
27 Feb 2010, 7:20 am by Legal Beagle
It may be subject to editorial revision.In the case of Richard Anderson v. the United Kingdom,The European Court of Human Rights (Fourth Section), sitting as a Chamber composed of:Lech Garlicki, President,Nicolas Bratza,Giovanni Bonello,Ljiljana Mijovic,Päivi Hirvelä,Ledi Bianku,Nebojša Vucinic, judges,and Lawrence Early, Section Registrar, Having deliberated in private on 19 January 2010,Delivers the following judgment, which was adopted on that date:PROCEDURE#… [read post]